fasmg GCC x86 backend
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 1:19 pm
The Place to Start for Operating System Developers
https://f.osdev.org/
I don't really see the point of using Fasm to assemble GCC AS formated code...Octocontrabass wrote:What are the advantages of using fasmg instead of as with gcc?
Are there any disadvantages?
Neither do I, which is why I asked. (Maybe you meant to direct these questions towards mikegonta?)AMenard wrote:I don't really see the point of using Fasm to assemble GCC AS formated code...
According to the thread linked in the first post, this is for Intel syntax only.AMenard wrote:Why not use Fasm own syntax instead of writing your code in AT&T syntax, which many dislike?