Page 1 of 1

fasmg GCC x86 backend

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 1:19 pm
by mikegonta

Re: fasmg GCC x86 backend

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 1:31 pm
by Octocontrabass
What are the advantages of using fasmg instead of as with gcc?

Are there any disadvantages?

Re: fasmg GCC x86 backend

Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2017 12:07 pm
by AMenard
Octocontrabass wrote:What are the advantages of using fasmg instead of as with gcc?

Are there any disadvantages?
I don't really see the point of using Fasm to assemble GCC AS formated code...
Why not use Fasm own syntax instead of writing your code in AT&T syntax, which many dislike?

Re: fasmg GCC x86 backend

Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2017 12:37 pm
by Octocontrabass
AMenard wrote:I don't really see the point of using Fasm to assemble GCC AS formated code...
Neither do I, which is why I asked. (Maybe you meant to direct these questions towards mikegonta?)
AMenard wrote:Why not use Fasm own syntax instead of writing your code in AT&T syntax, which many dislike?
According to the thread linked in the first post, this is for Intel syntax only.

Re: fasmg GCC x86 backend

Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2017 12:49 pm
by AMenard
Oh I was just quoting you to add to what you were saying... My bad.