fasmg GCC x86 backend

This forums is for OS project announcements including project openings, new releases, update notices, test requests, and job openings (both paying and volunteer).
Post Reply
mikegonta
Member
Member
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 5:13 am
Contact:
Contact mikegonta

fasmg GCC x86 backend

Post by mikegonta »

https://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=19889
Mike Gonta
look and see - many look but few see

https://mikegonta.com
Top
Octocontrabass
Member
Member
Posts: 5515
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:01 pm

Re: fasmg GCC x86 backend

Post by Octocontrabass »

What are the advantages of using fasmg instead of as with gcc?

Are there any disadvantages?
Top
AMenard
Member
Member
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:27 pm

Re: fasmg GCC x86 backend

Post by AMenard »

Octocontrabass wrote:What are the advantages of using fasmg instead of as with gcc?

Are there any disadvantages?
I don't really see the point of using Fasm to assemble GCC AS formated code...
Why not use Fasm own syntax instead of writing your code in AT&T syntax, which many dislike?
Top
Octocontrabass
Member
Member
Posts: 5515
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:01 pm

Re: fasmg GCC x86 backend

Post by Octocontrabass »

AMenard wrote:I don't really see the point of using Fasm to assemble GCC AS formated code...
Neither do I, which is why I asked. (Maybe you meant to direct these questions towards mikegonta?)
AMenard wrote:Why not use Fasm own syntax instead of writing your code in AT&T syntax, which many dislike?
According to the thread linked in the first post, this is for Intel syntax only.
Top
AMenard
Member
Member
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:27 pm

Re: fasmg GCC x86 backend

Post by AMenard »

Oh I was just quoting you to add to what you were saying... My bad.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Announcements, Test Requests, & Job openings”