Page 1 of 1
Spam collecting topic
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:03 pm
by axej6d73
Hi!
Yesterday I found xxxx xxxx resourse with HQ downloadable movies.
No credit card, registration and other crap!
High quality FULL LENGTH movies absolutely fo FREE!
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:35 pm
by Candy
For principle I figured it'd be best to make a topic collecting all the spam being posted here so that if one contains useful information (or a joke or such) that somebody didn't want to lose, it's stored. Also, it allows people to see how much spam we're actually getting.
This is an idea of course. If you have a reaction on the idea, please post here too.
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:26 pm
by chasetec
You're going to kill my entertainment. It's kinda fun just to keep refreshing MT to see if I can spot the spam before it gets deleted
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:49 pm
by df
i would have deleted it but my work proxy wouldnt let me near it
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:31 am
by Kon-Tiki
Let's hope we'll get spam for Real Genuine Grandma Onion Soup[size=0][sup]TM[/sup][/size]
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:23 am
by Pype.Clicker
i identified 69.210.77.129 and 67.163.153.198 as being spammers ... don't know if it will be helpful though ... they do not seem to operate from one (or a few) IP block this time...
deleted spam from 61.191.20.211 on 2006.10.06-4pm
The Food we eat
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:44 am
by Attarri
A Doctor was addressing a large audience in Tampa. "The material we put into our stomachs is enough to have killed most of us sitting here, years ago.
Red meat is awful. Soft drinks corrode your stomach lining. Chinese food is loaded with MSG. High fat diets can be disastrous, and none of us realizes the long-term harm caused by the germs in our drinking water. But there is one thing that is the most dangerous of all and we all have, or will, eat it. Can anyone here tell me what food it is that causes the most grief and suffering for years after eating it?"
After several seconds of quiet, a 75-year-old man in the front row raised his hand, and softly said, "Wedding Cake."
diamond earrings
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 7:01 pm
by AGI1122
I honstely don't see much point in keeping this tread. Plus eventually it will become huge. Oh and last thing we need is google or other search engines indexing the site by this content.
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:58 pm
by Candy
Chris Cromer wrote:
I honstely don't see much point in keeping this tread. Plus eventually it will become huge. Oh and last thing we need is google or other search engines indexing the site by this content.
Wasn't sure of it either, but I figured I should give it a stab and see what others thought. The content is mostly still filtered, the URL's are removed (so the spammers don't get any link advantage).
If you disagree, feel free to delete this entire topic.
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:24 am
by Pype.Clicker
well, if the point is to be able to
count how much spam we get (e.g. how much administrators/modders have to remove each day, what IP addresses it comes from, bla bla bla), then the topic may have some sense.
But if it's just to collect the spams we get?? wtf? the links might very well be replaced by
http://deleted, just seeing yet another fr3e oFf3r f0r ch3@p xxxx makes me willing to fly miles and miles away from Internet, see? And if we simply "post them back here", we're even losing the initial IP address, so regular members might see their account disabled ...
Even if those spams have "interesting" stories about Sony recalling all PS2 because they could start hunting for your kitty due to a firmware bug ... Would you trust a spammer to deliver news? Or would you rather get the slashdot-sidebar for your webbrowser?
(not mentionning potential 14-old lurking at this topic and then 'yum yum ... pr0n spams posted here ... let's hunt to see if i can get one link before it gets deleted')
<edit> another spammer today from 72.133.41.246 </edit>
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:18 am
by Candy
My main intent was to give people some tracking ability, partly because of the spams with jokes (bad jokes, old jokes, but nevertheless not entirely worthless) and partly because of losing all the IP address information that would be usable in tracking whether somebody is a spammer or not.
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:51 am
by chasetec
Tracking IP addresses for Forum spam posting is completely pointless. Take 2 of the IP addresses listed in this thread:
69.210.77.129 is in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and uses an Ameritech DSL line.
67.163.153.198 is in Bridgeville, Pennsylvania and uses a Comcast cable modem.
A couple of non-techie people that don't know any better probably got their Windows systems infected with a virus/trojan that contained a forum spam bot. The bot may never get back to this forum and if it does those accounts have a good chance of using dynamic ip addresses.
What works much better than ip blocking is to require email address verification and ban email addresses and domains. Of course this is only the tip of the iceberg, a lot more needs to get done....
I know you guys get a lot of spam but exactly how much? How much per day do each of the admins delete on average?
Re:Spam collecting topic
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:08 pm
by Candy
Chase@OSDev wrote:
I know you guys get a lot of spam but exactly how much? How much per day do each of the admins delete on average?
I remove between 0 and 3 per day. I expect the rest to do the same or slightly more (usually see some threads disappeared before I reacted) so that would be 5 or 6 a day, for the days that I pay attention. It's doable but annoying.