Linux linux linux...

All off topic discussions go here. Everything from the funny thing your cat did to your favorite tv shows. Non-programming computer questions are ok too.
User avatar
Zacariaz
Member
Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:36 pm
Contact:

Linux linux linux...

Post by Zacariaz »

I know we have had this discussion a number of times, but if it's not too much trouble, I would like to take it again.

I have been running xubuntu for a a month or two now. It works, but I wouldn't exactly call it stable and though it's fairly user friendly, I have more or less decided to live without the "user friendliness" and use a more stable system instead.

My first thought of course was Debian Etch/stable, but it seems that the only reason it's as stable as it is, is due to extensive testing, which of course means it's not exactly up to date.

I have been googlin' hard to find some answers, but as you know, people never seems to agree on anything.

So, here I am, asking the people I know actually knows a thing or two about the subject: "What should I choose?"
The keywords is: stabel, secure, maintained and expandable.

I have of course considered trying my luck with a LFS system, but it seems a bit premature for me, although a certain person at this forum tried to convince me that it was actually not that hard...


Thanks
This was supposed to be a cool signature...
User avatar
01000101
Member
Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:47 pm
Contact:

Post by 01000101 »

I personally like just plain Ubuntu 7.10, but Fedora 9 is great as well. Also, fedora is basically RHEL just the prev generation, so its deffinately stable.
itisiuk
Member
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:46 pm

Post by itisiuk »

I use fedora 9 in vmware running on windows vista, and ive never had a problem. and its really user friendly too.
User avatar
Zacariaz
Member
Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:36 pm
Contact:

Post by Zacariaz »

Maybe my bad experiense with ubuntu has to do with the fact that I'. running 64 bit?
This was supposed to be a cool signature...
User avatar
Combuster
Member
Member
Posts: 9301
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Libera.chat IRC: [com]buster
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
Contact:

Post by Combuster »

I would plug gentoo here, as it has all the points you want. However in regard to user friendliness the choice is pretty debatable as it is kindof overwhelming for newcomers. If you're decently familiar with linux you might just like it though.
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]
User avatar
Alboin
Member
Member
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Noricum and Pannonia

Post by Alboin »

Another for Gentoo. It hits all of your keywords.

A note on Fedora: Fedora generally uses the newest of the new in terms of software, so if you're looking for proven stability, that might not be your choice.
C8H10N4O2 | #446691 | Trust the nodes.
User avatar
Zacariaz
Member
Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:36 pm
Contact:

Post by Zacariaz »

I had almost forgotten about Gentoo, I'm gonna do some reading and get back to you.

thanks for now.

edit:
regarding Gentoo, my first question is about Portage vs. dpkg/apt/aptitute (the Debian way). I am used to the Debian way and of course I'm concerned. Any notes?
This was supposed to be a cool signature...
User avatar
piranha
Member
Member
Posts: 1391
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Unknown. Momentum is pretty certain, however.
Contact:

Post by piranha »

I personally use OpenSuse, as the dev tools are very easy to install, and the new version come out in 9 days or so.

It's quite stable, and quite easy to use.

-JL
SeaOS: Adding VT-x, networking, and ARM support
dbittman on IRC, @danielbittman on twitter
https://dbittman.github.io
User avatar
Zacariaz
Member
Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:36 pm
Contact:

Post by Zacariaz »

Well, I'm going to try installing Gentoo shortly, but if I can't get wireless working I won't get much further as I'm not home at the moment.

Thanks for the help and keep posting if you have any comments.
This was supposed to be a cool signature...
iammisc
Member
Member
Posts: 269
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:23 pm

Post by iammisc »

Zacariaz wrote: Well, I'm going to try installing Gentoo shortly, but if I can't get wireless working I won't get much further as I'm not home at the moment.
Well as long as there is a linux driver for your wireless card, you should conceivably be able to get it working. However, depending on how popular your card is, you might be in for a lot of digging around. A lot of drivers for rather rare cards or cheap cards are very finicky. For example, my wireless card will only work with WEP if you configure it once with all the settings, bring the interface down , bring the interface up, configure it with the same settings and then run dhcpcd. However, gentoo's quite powerful and I have no doubt you'll be able to fix any problems you might have.
User avatar
panxu
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 7:11 am
Location: 重庆

Post by panxu »

I stopped shuffling between distros(red hat/fedora, ukx-buntu, gentoo, opensuse, mandriva) after I find Arch.
And here is a wireless tutor in archwiki
Welcome to 重庆
User avatar
Zacariaz
Member
Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:36 pm
Contact:

Post by Zacariaz »

I never dreamed that installing gentoo would be so much trouble.
In past I have messed around with debian, fedora and ubuntu, but none them put up much of a fight.
Last edited by Zacariaz on Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This was supposed to be a cool signature...
jgraef
Member
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:37 am
Location: Wonsheim, Germany

Post by jgraef »

Hi,

I tried several distributions of Linux and for me Suse 10.1 is a very stable system. Ok, YaST's package manager is a bit slow, but that's the only contra I can think of at the moment. My Suse Linux runs now for a few years and no reinstallation will be required in nearer future. I tried to install Suse 10.3 a few times. At the beginning it works fine and looks nice. I especially like Beryl and the One-Click-Installation (I know that you might think that these things are only for newbies, but I just like it). But after some days Suse 10.3 just crashes for my machine. I had 'mount' pagefaulting and I think if this happens you can forget it. I then just returned to Suse 10.1. For me this is my favourite.
User avatar
piranha
Member
Member
Posts: 1391
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Unknown. Momentum is pretty certain, however.
Contact:

Post by piranha »

Opensuse11 comes out soon, and it has much faster package management.
Maybe that would work...
-JL
SeaOS: Adding VT-x, networking, and ARM support
dbittman on IRC, @danielbittman on twitter
https://dbittman.github.io
User avatar
Alboin
Member
Member
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Noricum and Pannonia

Post by Alboin »

piranha wrote:Opensuse11 comes out soon, and it has much faster package management.
Maybe that would work...
-JL
Suse has package management? :twisted:
C8H10N4O2 | #446691 | Trust the nodes.
Post Reply