Page 1 of 1
The programmer Device
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 11:41 am
by Dex
What do you endup with if you ask a group of games programmers and a group of OS Dev, what they want from a handheld device ?.
ANSWER
http://www.openpandora.org/
I have been working on a DexOS ver for this device and can not Waite until they are available to the general public
.
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 3:25 pm
by Pyrofan1
It's only a matter of time before they have WoW running on that
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 4:59 pm
by Combuster
25% more expensive than a DS and 10x computing power. Wow.
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 5:18 pm
by Zenith
Here in Canada, it's more like 2.5 times the price (DS costs like $120)...
You have to admit though, that does look pretty awesome! It has a decent processor, great graphics power, SD card readers and even a USB port! That is epic.
Hopefully it'll support something better than WiFi
...
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 5:34 pm
by Brynet-Inc
A "programmers" device that has a proprietary GPU, the only way to access it is a binary Linux driver blob?
I'll pass, this system isn't "developer friendly" enough..
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 6:48 pm
by Alboin
Brynet-Inc wrote:I'll pass, this system isn't "developer friendly" enough..
Wow. You're like that guy who rejects those who reject the norm to begin with. A rejecter rejecter, if you will.
That's pretty hardcore.
Personally, I just like to reject myself rejecting the norm, thus rejecting myself tail recursive style.
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:03 am
by jal
Dex wrote:http://www.openpandora.org/ I have been working on a DexOS ver for this device and can not Waite until they are available to the general public ;) .
Brynet-Inc wrote:A "programmers" device that has a proprietary GPU, the only way to access it is a binary Linux driver blob?
So, if you are both right, Dex is using the binary blob? Any device that cannot natively run my OS is not worth having :).
JAL
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:10 am
by Brynet-Inc
jal wrote:So, if you are both right, Dex is using the binary blob? Any device that cannot natively run my OS is not worth having
.
JAL
The CPU is ARM, the GPU is proprietary.. primitive visuals may be possible, but the 3D capabilities the device boasts will be restricted.
If the didn't allow native code, (
Java or something..) I would have asked that this thread be burned and Dex be banned for abandoning his low-level principles..
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:15 am
by Combuster
You could always reverse engineer that binary blob. They broke down ATI's GameCube chip before, They worked out the DreamCast's PowerVR chip (pandora's got a PowerVR too) and those aren't even the things with the largest cult around...
So brynet-inc, Do the community a favor and spend your time actually helping the world get rid of binary blobs
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:56 am
by jal
Combuster wrote:You could always reverse engineer that binary blob.
Yeah, but that costs quite a lot of time, time I'm not willing to invest. On the other hand, the 2D framebuffer stuff is opened up, so simple applications could use that.
JAL
Re: The programmer Device
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:59 am
by Pype.Clicker
not mentionning that all we know of the DS chip was obtained through reverse-engineering too
Re: The programmer Device
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:25 am
by Dex
Cool to see you post Pype.Clicker
.
Re: The programmer Device
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:26 am
by suthers
I agree, haven't seen you in ages...
Jules
edit: weird two regulars have come back recently... (df and Pype.Clicker...)