Page 1 of 2

Testing Knoppix

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:50 pm
by crazygray1
Well I got Knoppix running on this computer. :D
:D :D :D

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:19 pm
by Bobalandi
MAy I ask why knoppix instead of ubuntu or any other distro?

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:13 pm
by crazygray1
I was just testing it out and secondly, I have a slow computer.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:15 pm
by Bobalandi
gotcha; have you tried dsl?

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:22 pm
by crazygray1
It's next on my list.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:28 pm
by Bobalandi
It's pretty good, but the thing I don't like about any linux distro is the problem of getting wireless cards to work.

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:47 am
by Dex
Have you tryed backtrack2 , as it works fine with all the wireless card i have tested it on, right out of the box (its a live disto like knoppix )

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:54 am
by Bobalandi
Like, my wireless cards require to be installed with a cd that has a windows program, so I'm not sure whether it would work.

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:23 pm
by crazygray1
The video card on the slow computer I have died when I was installing DSL. But after testing it out I can surely say that I am a Linux fanatic! :D

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 1:00 pm
by Dex
Bobalandi wrote:Like, my wireless cards require to be installed with a cd that has a windows program, so I'm not sure whether it would work.
Backtrack2 come's with many Wireless card drivers on the disk, because its designed for hacking and for that you use wireless .

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 2:18 pm
by crazygray1
:D :D Well, I just got a replacement for that computer. :D It has:

2 GHZ AMD Sempron
1GB Ram(4-8 possible I think)
Now I can run a better version of Linux on that computer probablly ubuntu(64 bit!). :D Also, now I can write and test a 64 bit OS and run apps that require more than a tiny 96 Megs of RAM. :D :D

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:42 am
by ucosty
You love the :D smiley, don't you.

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:26 am
by Solar
Bobalandi wrote:...the thing I don't like about any linux distro is the problem of getting wireless cards to work.
You need to know which chipset is used in your card, and which driver is necessary for that chipset. And you have to know where to put the configuration for your connection. Personally, I edit /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf and /etc/conf.d/net manually, because I don't believe in too many config helpers.

Atheros chipsets work excellent with the madwifi driver, the Intel ABG3945 (used in many laptops) works just fine with ipw3945 (or its designated successor iwlwifi). Many more drivers are actually part of the kernel. If you want to do WPA encription (as you should), you also need wpa_supplicant.

It's always worth checking the docs and forums of your favourite distro for howto's on wireless setup, as it's usually made much easier than having to install the stuff linked above manually.

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:19 am
by xyzzy
Bobalandi wrote:It's pretty good, but the thing I don't like about any linux distro is the problem of getting wireless cards to work.
A lot of distros these days have NetworkManager by default (Fedora 8 does definitely), which helps a lot with wireless set up. Fedora 8 has worked without any additional configuration with all the wireless cards I've tried.

Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:08 pm
by crazygray1
I just got Ubuntu set up. I'm going to have this computer multi-boot Ubuntu and Vista.