OSDev.org

Posted: **Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:39 pm**

Brynet-Inc wrote: It was also developed for the original AT&T UNIX systems it should be treated with a bit more respect!.

I will treat C programmers as they treat basic programmers and as they treat me.

Now BASIC for example is a sad sorry excuse for a language

I demand all the people i have helped to say they respect! me.
If my demand are not met, i will go to the dark side and be come a hacker

They treat ASM programmers like GODS.

I am off now to work on my new site, no C programmers are allowed

Posted: **Tue Nov 07, 2006 8:48 pm**

Dex wrote:
Brynet-Inc wrote: It was also developed for the original AT&T UNIX systems it should be treated with a bit more respect!.
I will treat C programmers as they treat basic programmers and as they treat me.
Now BASIC for example is a sad sorry excuse for a language
I demand all the people i have helped to say they respect! me.
If my demand are not met, i will go to the dark side and be come a hacker
They treat ASM programmers like GODS.

I am off now to work on my new site, no C programmers are allowed
http://hunger.hu/win.html

I respect you MAN.

Posted: **Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:19 am**

Dex wrote:
Brynet-Inc wrote: It was also developed for the original AT&T UNIX systems it should be treated with a bit more respect!.
I will treat C programmers as they treat basic programmers and as they treat me.
Now BASIC for example is a sad sorry excuse for a language
I demand all the people i have helped to say they respect! me.
If my demand are not met, i will go to the dark side and be come a hacker
They treat ASM programmers like GODS.

I am off now to work on my new site, no C programmers are allowed
http://hunger.hu/win.html

Its Was a joke, to see how many C programmers i could get to visit my new site with jokes about C programmers

Posted: **Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:14 am**

Wow Dex, pretty nice web site yo have...

When I tried to open it, Windows with Firefox has frozen. 10 seconds later and mouse stopped working

. Eventually, when i tried to press any key - the PC speaker beeped, because the computer was totally locked up... After next 10 seconds, BIOS automatically restarted the computer.

Weird?!

inflater

Posted: **Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:30 am**

Sorry inflater, Its was only suppose to do that to C programmer

Posted: **Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:41 am**

I feel left out now... i just got a boring "works on windows" message and no annoying loss of ability to work...

Posted: **Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:43 am**

Ahh, The power of OpenBSD..

Dex

Posted: **Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:30 am**

Dex wrote:Its Was a joke, to see how many C programmers i could get to visit my new site with jokes about C programmers http://hunger.hu/win.html

Wow... I can just feel my respect for you growing by the minute. Oh wait, no, sorry. I got confused, I'm just annoyed at having to reboot.

Posted: **Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:36 am**

Dex wrote:Sorry inflater, Its was only suppose to do that to C programmer

width="9999999" height="9999999", hmm ??

dude, you know that quote about "shorter jokes are better jokes" ? Is there really a need to come again and again about those rants against people that think they are superior because blahblahblah?

Even if you've been pissed of by some guys that program in C, why do you feel the need to throw it back at anyone who's doing C?

Posted: **Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:46 am**

Split the topic because it was getting a little off topic, if anyone is wondering the web page is this:

Code: Select all

HTTP Status Code: HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date:	Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:49:12 GMT	CRLF
Server:	HungerHTTPd-3.14.15	CRLF
Connection:	close	CRLF
Transfer-Encoding:	chunked	CRLF
Content-Type:	text/html; charset=iso-8859-2	CRLF
Content (0.12 KiB)

<HTML>
  <BODY>
    <IMG SRC="img.jpg" width="9999999" height="9999999"><BR>
    Works on Windows... :)
  </BODY>
</HTML>

Seems some windows setups consume all memory or something when trying to scale the image. The image is valid http://hunger.hu/img.jpg, is that a young Dex? The other interesting thing to notice is the server type reported. Is that Apache with the server string replace or a custom http server?

Posted: **Thu Nov 09, 2006 2:44 am**

odd, it crashed the first time i tried to view it with a blue screen in XP.
but now it does nothing bad?

Posted: **Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:40 am**

Cool! How many hacks do you find from a stupid half-done communication system?

Posted: **Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:18 am**

Cheery wrote: Cool! How many hacks do you find from a stupid half-done communication system?

well, as long as i can tell, it will have little to do with the communication system. It's more like a bug in the windowing system that tries to allocates a 999999x999999 surface to render the picture, quickly saturating all memory resources.

I can retrieve a broken HTML generator that nested levels of <table> to the point it completely saturated X on my linux, if you want ... The first time it occured to me, i ranted for hours about Netscape being broken and rebooted the computer. Nowadays, i'd just press the keycombo to fall back to text consoles, kill the offending browser window (ranting a few minutes about bookmarks being losts, and blahblahblah), then come back to X and start working again ...

Posted: **Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:00 am**

No. It has much to do with http, html, and such. There would be less bugs in client if those would be simpler and further sophisticated.

Posted: **Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:08 am**

Hi,

Cheery wrote:No. It has much to do with http, html, and such. There would be less bugs in client if those would be simpler and further sophisticated.

I'd say it has more to do with software quality (or lack of defensive programming).

What sort of programmer takes a value from anywhere on the internet, and then allocates memory based on this "value from anywhere" without first checking if that value is within a suitable range?

Cheers,

Brendan

OSDev.org

A way to hang windows

A way to hang windows