Page 7 of 11

Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:02 pm
by Alboin
Jeremiah Griffin wrote:
ProgressGirl wrote:I use Vi and GCC on FreeBSD.
Someone's hardcore. :-)
I use vi and gcc on Gentoo. In fact, a lot of people use console editors, GCC, and *nix.

Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 4:42 pm
by jzgriffin
I use console editors most of the time, when in *NIX. But, I've never heard of anyone using Vi anymore other than in examples of editing configuration files, as Vi is in almost every distribution. I used to use Vi because Vim was too confusing, but now I find Vi more unusable than Vim used to be for me. :-p

Plus, there was no mention of X, which lead me to the assumption that ProgressGirl uses Vi on an X-less FreeBSD box. I could be wrong, though.

Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:09 am
by xyjamepa
Here's mine I code my os in my bedroom,
most of the time ,I'm coding after midnight

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:19 pm
by Combuster
My turn :D

Code: Select all

                                   +----+
 A Main dev PC (Athlon XP 2200)    |    | 
 B PC with working USB (P3)        |    | 
 C Main test box (2xP2)            | A  | 
 D Previous dev PC (Celeron-500)   |    | 
 E Previous webserver (P1-200)     |    | 
 F Stolen information (P2)         |    | 
 G Yet another box (P1)      +-----+----+
 H My first PC (486DX)       |    B     |
 I SCSI storage for M        +----------+
 J Huge KVM (without cables) |          |
 K rotting ethernet switch   |          |
 L Audio stuff + 4way KVM    |  (vaccum)|
 M Sleeping dragon (PA-RISC) | C(leaner)| +-+
 N Serial terminal (middle)  |          | | |  
                             |          | | |  N-->
                             |          | +--+ 
                             |          +-+L |
                             +----------+-+--+     
=============================================
  SSSSSS                      +------------+
 +-------+                    |            |
 +---J---+   +--K--+          |            |
  .     .  +------------+     |            |
  .     .  |     E      +-----+            |
  .     .  +------------+     |  M(onster) |
+----------+     F      |     |            |
|          +------------+  D  |            |
|    I     |     G      |     |            |
|          +------------+     |            |
|          |     H      |     |            |
+----------+------------+-----+------------+
(there are 5 computers not on that image)

Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:53 am
by svdmeer
I'm developing under FreeBSD. Gnome, gedit, bochs, make, gcc and of course nasm.

In 1999 I did some OS-development for the firsttime. At that time I still used Windows with Tasm. Missing any flexibility and power..

For my job I have to use Windows XP. Both FreeBSD and Windows XP have access to my FreeBSD-server where my projects are stored.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 1:19 am
by elderK
I develop first under Linux, using rxvt, vi/vim, gcc, bash, ratpoison.

Then, I test that the sources and subsystems work under _another_ hosted environment. So, for Windows, I use vim, rxvt, gcc, bash (msys)

:) Unlike a lot of the people here, I have one machine. A year old laptop - I do all development on this machine. :) Including testing (yes, im brave).

If kernel builds work nicely on the laptop, ill test on unsuspecting Internet cafe and University machines ... Again, yes, Im brave.

~Z

Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:59 pm
by Candy
Image

My current setup. The one on the left is my laptop, 15.4". The other two are my main computer, 19" and 24". This is (still) a dream to work on. All the space you can think you need, all the windows you need and a proper second screen for Bochs & auxiliary output.

I only got this setup this morning so it might not be as good as I now think it is. I'm pretty happy though :)

Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 3:48 pm
by Alboin
@Candy: Is that coffee making materials on the right there? Ice cubes...What? :-s

Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 3:50 pm
by Candy
Alboin wrote:@Candy: Is that coffee making materials on the right there? Ice cubes...What? :-s
That's both a yep and a yep. It's 30c here, ice cubes are for a reason. I should be filling that thing up and putting it back into the fridge, but debugging is so much more fun...

Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 4:00 pm
by blound
all those icons would give me headaches ;(

here is mine ...

Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 8:00 pm
by DeletedAccount
I can't afford 3 or 4 computers like u fellows do .. but here is my system and workarea .

Re: here is mine ...

Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 8:45 pm
by Alboin
SandeepMathew wrote:I can't afford 3 or 4 computers like u fellows do .. .
I think most of the aforementioned computers were accrued rather than bought in one lump sum.

Re: here is mine ...

Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 2:09 am
by Candy
Alboin wrote:
SandeepMathew wrote:I can't afford 3 or 4 computers like u fellows do .. .
I think most of the aforementioned computers were accrued rather than bought in one lump sum.
Quite true. This computer has a lineage back to about 1997. It's only been near "good" since 2 years, since I got a job to pay for non-cheap parts. About 2 years ago it was a bit worse than your setup :).

Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 2:26 am
by JamesM
Ahem! My turn I think!

I develop both at work and at home, and I'm at work now, so here she blows:

http://www.jamesmolloy.co.uk/rubbish-bi ... enshot.png

I'll upload a pic of my home work environment and desk etc later ;)

James

Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:42 am
by JamesM
As promised - my desk at home:

http://www.jamesmolloy.co.uk/rubbish-bin/home1.jpg

And a picture of my boxen - they usually live more under the bed than this!

The one closest to the camera is my MIPSel box, the other one under the bed is "kryten", my x86 test box, and my main desktop (situated on the far right) is "lister".

http://www.jamesmolloy.co.uk/rubbish-bin/home2.jpg