Page 5 of 5
Re: Moving from Java to C++
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:45 am
by Love4Boobies
Solar wrote:i586coder wrote:you see, even JAVA still need programing language such assembly/C++ in some parts...
I find it quite amusing, in language arguments like these, that the Sun JVM is written in C++.
There's a research project about a Java-written VM, but that hasn't hit mainstream yet (and I am pretty sure that some core components will
still be written in, not just "any other compiled language", but C++).
I disagree. It would be silly to code an assembler in assembly. Are you saying assembly is BS?
Re: Moving from Java to C++
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:42 am
by JAAman
Love4Boobies wrote:
I disagree. It would be silly to code an assembler in assembly. Are you saying assembly is BS?
i would be careful what you say... there are people who believe that its not a real assembler if its not written in assembly...
Re: Moving from Java to C++
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:49 am
by Love4Boobies
JAAman wrote:Love4Boobies wrote:
I disagree. It would be silly to code an assembler in assembly. Are you saying assembly is BS?
i would be careful what you say... there are people who believe that its not a real assembler if its not written in assembly...
What would be the benefits? From what I can tell:
- importability (you couldn't have cross-assemblers)
- harder to maintain and easier for bugs to slip in
- a lot more work
How's that for being productive?
Re: Moving from Java to C++
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:56 pm
by DeletedAccount
Hi,
I do not have an answer to your question . But there are people who think that writing in assembly language is more productive than using a High Level Language
.
Regards
Shrek
Re: Moving from Java to C++
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:40 pm
by Combuster
writing in assembly language is more productive
If this applies to you, you'll already know it
