D.i.N.S. v1.0B

This forums is for OS project announcements including project openings, new releases, update notices, test requests, and job openings (both paying and volunteer).

Which administration method would you want?

Web-GUI to full network (public Router/Switch style)
14
61%
Web-GUI to one machine (Cisco style)
3
13%
Serial-Based TUI console
4
17%
Parrallel-Based TUI console
0
No votes
No configurability || pre-configured (black-box style)
0
No votes
Other (explain in post)
2
9%
 
Total votes: 23

User avatar
01000101
Member
Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: D.i.N.S. v1.0B

Post by 01000101 »

lukem95 wrote:nice work :)

just wondering... what is the security benefit of not using interrupts?
I really meant to put emphasis on the 'interrupts of any kind' as it actually makes more sense in the security discussion, but anways.
01000101 wrote: My OS is now fully Polling based, and no longer supports external interrupts of any kind for security reasons.
With the lack of IRQ triggers (that I preiously had), no one can plug a keyboard in and start typing, no post-config hotswapping, basically no response to anything except ethernet lines. With that said though, I do poll critical hardware to ensure that it is still working or has been taken (thus reporting an error to an admin about physical problems). I would also like to implement a feature that detects when the case is opened, but that is not a standard, and is specific to manufacturers. I hope that all was legible as I just woek up.
User avatar
lukem95
Member
Member
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:03 am
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: D.i.N.S. v1.0B

Post by lukem95 »

ah, that seems to make sense.

the opening case idea sounds pretty cool too, good luck getting that one working :)
~ Lukem95 [ Cake ]
Release: 0.08b
Image
Post Reply