Page 3 of 3
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 3:00 pm
by Tyler
anon19287473 wrote:
Wow, *sarcasm* just as stable as NT, that's quite an accomplishment. DOS is better than Window's at this point, at least DOS doesn't introduce security flaws because they don't want me to steal music/movies (*cough* protected processes *cough*)
Hmm, this is rather annoying given i am no fan of Windows, but blatent bullshit always seems to get on my nerves. The NT Kernel is very stable, i have never once known it to crash, only ever faulty drivers/hardware. The fact you don't like Windows in general is no reason to lie, we are here to explore the realities of operating systems; unfortunately i am sure your next comments will try to convince me Linux is an amazing kernel.
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 4:09 pm
by Kevin McGuire
9/22 posts have gone considerably off-topic which is not really abnormal but does become abnormal when one realizes this sub forum is called:
Announcements, Test Requests, And Job Openings"
Where are the moderators that used to split and move threads.. Are they all gone?
Could we not create a thread just for a vista versus whatever discussion?
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 8:25 am
by inflater
Definitely. Throw on an old comp. if you've got one, or dual boot. I bet you'd like it
Well I try to download Linux as soon I've gotten friend's desktop HP Vectra 500 with 486 inside, he told me that he can give it to me without paying c@$h (Actually, he wanted to smash the big old-skool PC with a lead pipe, so...
). What Linux do you prefer for this slow machine? (And for Windows/DOS CLI user?)
9/22 posts have gone considerably off-topic which is not really abnormal but does become abnormal when one realizes this sub forum is called:
So be a moderator then
, I was only comparing "McRiosoft Windows Astalavista, Copyleft (C) 2oo7 by Bill Gates, All Rights and Lefts Reserved" to other operating systems.
//EDIT: Let's put the linux discussion somewhere else, to make mods happy.
inflater