Re:AMD versus Intel
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 5:09 am
Huh? 2 HDs with different size - is that a new trend?
Just from a look at the prices, I'd spend those few extra bucks for the second core. I mean, really, at that price it doesn't matter anymore?
Of course the performance gain will depend on the way you use your computer. Most current games, for ex., will probably not benefit _that_ much from the second core. But consider that the single-core athlon runs at 2.4 GHz, while the X2 is clocked to 2.0 GHz, so for pure single-tasking you *might* notice missing processing power with the X2. So you might want to check some benchmarks.
If you don't do games, and use it mainly for video encoding (with SMP-optimized software), building software, or everyday (multitasked) work, you'd probably be better off with the X2, IMO.
cheers Joe
Just from a look at the prices, I'd spend those few extra bucks for the second core. I mean, really, at that price it doesn't matter anymore?
Of course the performance gain will depend on the way you use your computer. Most current games, for ex., will probably not benefit _that_ much from the second core. But consider that the single-core athlon runs at 2.4 GHz, while the X2 is clocked to 2.0 GHz, so for pure single-tasking you *might* notice missing processing power with the X2. So you might want to check some benchmarks.
If you don't do games, and use it mainly for video encoding (with SMP-optimized software), building software, or everyday (multitasked) work, you'd probably be better off with the X2, IMO.
cheers Joe