Page 2 of 2
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:16 am
by Combuster
Before the first post edits, the rules read that it had to work on everything from the first pc onward, which obviously does not work. I see that the text requirement has also magically halved from its original 120 symbols. It's not earning credibility for him to retroactively modify the rules so he can call people names.
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:14 pm
by Love4Boobies
I read that too so I can vouch for that.
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 1:06 pm
by guilherme
I just edit the conditions to make it a little easier, turning all the commands the same size.
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:30 pm
by VolTeK
Who hacked berkus?
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 5:07 pm
by gerryg400
Berkus, perhaps you need to hold up the 'sarcasm' sign.
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 10:24 pm
by guilherme
Ok, so i'll do what berkus has said.
And about the combuster, don't attack him, don't call him idiot, and not even be revolted with him, by a simple reason:
We must feel sorry by them, and not feel revolted. They don't deserve our effort to be revolted, being sorry is such easier for us, and such harder for they.
Some times the silence is devastating.
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:31 am
by MasterLee
To get an impression of how much space is needed for specific code look at following page:
http://www.fysnet.net/hugi/compoold.htm
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:15 am
by Chandra
GhostXoPCorp wrote:Who hacked berkus?
No one. He was just being sarcastic to the other guy (IMO).
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:11 am
by b.zaar
So umm who invited the OP to the party anyway?
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:20 am
by Solar
guilherme wrote:Ok, so i'll do what berkus has said.
We're looking forward to it.
guilherme wrote:And about the combuster, don't attack him, don't call him idiot...
*chuckle*
Some people can resist even the mighty
cluebat. (Or a </sarcasm> sign so big I can even
smell it.)
guilherme wrote:We must feel sorry by them, and not feel revolted. They don't deserve our effort to be revolted, being sorry is such easier for us, and such harder for they.
Oh yes, I do feel sorry for you.
guilherme wrote:Some times the silence is devastating.
Oh yes, the good old times. Where did they go?
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:21 pm
by VolTeK
The OP somehow gets his way and now takes back what he said about combuster? LOL its to bad no one cares
I wont post it this time, but there will be a time and reason to
Re: NEW CHALLENGE:
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:47 pm
by eddyb