OSDev.org

This appears to be a gross misunderstanding of the scientific method.

Please don't wiki-link something to me. I know how to use google. And what part is?

Exactly, I suspect you are not any sort of cognitive psychologist or studying anything related.

Not necessary. If you think about it, working together is intelligent. We do it. (but granted most of us are idiots anyway). Either way, working together is smart. If you disagree, you are wrong.

My dog almost never barks; the exception is when something is "wrong" (someone enters my apartment in the middle of the night while I'm asleep, for example), or when I'm trying to get him excited enough to bark.

Wasn't your point of view that we shouldn't base things on one thing? Many dogs are annoyingly loud...

-JL

Anyone who has lived with a cat for any significant amount of time knows that madeofstaples is wrong.

piranha wrote:

This appears to be a gross misunderstanding of the scientific method.

Please don't wiki-link something to me. I know how to use google. And what part is?

"it"?

piranha wrote:

Exactly, I suspect you are not any sort of cognitive psychologist or studying anything related.

Not necessary. If you think about it, working together is intelligent. We do it. (but granted most of us are idiots anyway). Either way, working together is smart. If you disagree, you are wrong.

False: parasitic relationships.

Bigger hands have worked on defining intelligence, cognition, etc. Let's leave it to them, or at least formulate your idea in a technical manner.

piranha wrote:

My dog almost never barks; the exception is when something is "wrong" (someone enters my apartment in the middle of the night while I'm asleep, for example), or when I'm trying to get him excited enough to bark.

Wasn't your point of view that we shouldn't base things on one thing? Many dogs are annoyingly loud...

Yes, I would concede that some dogs are loud. I was being a bit anecdotal.

Brynet-Inc wrote:Anyone who has lived with a cat for any significant amount of time knows that madeofstaples is wrong.

Odd, as that should include myself.

False: parasitic relationships.

Bigger hands have worked on defining intelligence, cognition, etc. Let's leave it to them, or at least formulate your idea in a technical manner.

So working together to achieve a goal is stupid? OH! It's all clear now!

And I have yet to see a good one. My definition is: "Any means that an animal can show how to stay alive, and demonstrate the ability to keep oneself occupied".

"it"?

Specifically, what part have I said thats against the SM? I've made observations, and deduced things accordingly.

Odd, as that should include myself.

Ohh...i get it. I love dogs. And hate them. Either way, this makes it so that you know that you're wrong. Win!

Either way, I've always thought that cats were smarter, and now I believe it even more strongly. Animals that would rather do their own things then pull on a string certainly seem smarted than animals who pull on a string when ever they're told.

-JL

Locked.

piranha, madeofstaples, to the sin bin. Brynet-Inc, you should know better than to pour fuel on the fire.