Page 2 of 2
Re: Who would like to try PellesC IDE?
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
by KotuxGuy
fronty wrote:KotuxGuy wrote:Nah, i prefer Kate+bash+GNOME
I find it weird that someone uses KDE's text editor with GNOME.
Um,people mix stuff from KDE,GNOME, and even XFCE all the time! Besides,KDE bogs down my PC,and Kate has indenting,syntax highlighting,and pretty much all the things an IDE has,except for integrated running/debugging.
PS: i might switch to SciTE or KDevelop or Eclipse soon,depending on my needs.
Re: Who would like to try PellesC IDE?
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:54 pm
by Owen
Which version of KDE is that? I have KDE4 running here in 500MB of RAM (Plus another 1GB of Chromium zygotes...); of which a significant portion is Amarok. I find KDE4 to be snappier and less of a RAM hog than GNOME, in a major shift from how things were with KDE3
Re: Who would like to try PellesC IDE?
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:14 pm
by fronty
KotuxGuy wrote:-- Kate has indenting,syntax highlighting,and pretty much all the things an IDE has,except for integrated running/debugging.
From gedit's website:
Currently it features:
Full support for internationalized text (UTF-8)
Configurable syntax highlighting for various languages (C, C++, Java, HTML, XML, Python, Perl and many others)
Undo/Redo
Editing files from remote locations
File reverting
Print and print preview support
Clipboard support (cut/copy/paste)
Search and replace
Go to specific line
Auto indentation
Text wrapping
Line numbers
Right margin
Current line highlighting
Bracket matching
Backup files
Configurable fonts and colors
A complete online user manual
I didn't find anything which tells refactoring features in Kate, any database tools, gui designer or anything, so it seems to me that gedit and Kate have mostly same things in different package.
KDE bogs down my PC
What, KDE bogs but GNOME doesn't? Have GNOME developers really made radically more lightweight than KDE?
Last time I have messed with GNOME a computer which couldn't run KDE smoothly couldn't run GNOME and vice versa.
Re: Who would like to try PellesC IDE?
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:32 pm
by KotuxGuy
Owen wrote:Which version of KDE is that? I have KDE4 running here in 500MB of RAM (Plus another 1GB of Chromium zygotes...); of which a significant portion is Amarok. I find KDE4 to be snappier and less of a RAM hog than GNOME, in a major shift from how things were with KDE3
I'm using a 5-year-old computer...
Re: Who would like to try PellesC IDE?
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:35 pm
by KotuxGuy
fronty wrote:KotuxGuy wrote:-- Kate has indenting,syntax highlighting,and pretty much all the things an IDE has,except for integrated running/debugging.
From gedit's website:
Currently it features:
Full support for internationalized text (UTF-8)
Configurable syntax highlighting for various languages (C, C++, Java, HTML, XML, Python, Perl and many others)
Undo/Redo
Editing files from remote locations
File reverting
Print and print preview support
Clipboard support (cut/copy/paste)
Search and replace
Go to specific line
Auto indentation
Text wrapping
Line numbers
Right margin
Current line highlighting
Bracket matching
Backup files
Configurable fonts and colors
A complete online user manual
I didn't find anything which tells refactoring features in Kate, any database tools, gui designer or anything, so it seems to me that gedit and Kate have mostly same things in different package.
KDE bogs down my PC
What, KDE bogs but GNOME doesn't? Have GNOME developers really made radically more lightweight than KDE?
Last time I have messed with GNOME a computer which couldn't run KDE smoothly couldn't run GNOME and vice versa.
I don't really
need "database tools or gui designer",and Kate
does have refactoring.