Page 2 of 2
Re: .NET programming in Linux
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:07 am
by redoktober
right!
fedora it is, then..
oh yeah, i forgot to tell you guys..
i took debian and wine 1.1.15 for a test drive.
it's worse than i thought.
the instant i started installing the .NET Framework 2.0, the box rebooted.
Re: .NET programming in Linux
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:40 am
by fara7at
There is also a mono included precompiled livecd called monoppix.
monoppix.com
Re: .NET programming in Linux
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:57 pm
by xvedejas
+1 for mono
Any of OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Arch, and Fedora ought to be fine. Personally I use Arch but I believe Novell makes pre-release binary packages for OpenSuSE.
Re: .NET programming in Linux
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:54 am
by redoktober
right.
got to dig up those DVDs...
Re: .NET programming in Linux
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:16 pm
by brickhead20
How about DotGNU?
Re: .NET programming in Linux
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:56 pm
by redoktober
i've had a look at it.
while it's a pretty good opportunity to learn more about .net internals, it's still not ready for production the way mono is..
Re: .NET programming in Linux
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 6:40 pm
by dude101
MessiahAndrw wrote:JohnnyTheDon wrote:I've never been a propenent of Microsoft, but CLR isn't a closed standard. In fact, its published with
ECMA. IIRC Java isn't truly and open standard. I remember reading something about it technically being owned by Sun. Might be wrong, but either way CLR isn't closed.
Exactly, and judging by B.E's signature I say his reply was written out of hatred for MS rather than research...
Yup, typical nerd arrogance. Why don't people ever give MS the credit they deserve?
Re: .NET programming in Linux
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:16 am
by redoktober
Yup, typical nerd arrogance. Why don't people ever give MS the credit they deserve
'tis okay, man.
each man unto his own!