OSDev.org

I have to agree with 01000101. Topics that begin with 'Message to ...' are, IMO, always a bad idea. Instead of creating this topic, I think a private message would have been sufficient.

Banning shouldn't be a public spectacle.

The topic title was decided by the moderator who split the previous thread.

01000101 wrote:no offense JamesM, but isn't this entire post a little hypocritical?

I agree, he does perform alot of hit-and-run postings, but you are obviously flaming him in this post and its sole perpose is to do just that, nothing else, and nothing productive.

I think if enough people dislike what he is doing, then kick him, else, leave it be.

Hi 01001001:

I think you're possibly taking this thread a little out of context - I replied (my first post on this thread) to binutils after he performed another hitandrun post, with a small message saying it was annoying. It snowballed, and I really really did not try to flame - if I did you really would know it - the thread got split and the moderator added the title.

Cheers,

James

ah, I see.

Wow, lots of responses.
I agree though, seeing several posts with links in 14 days is annoying.
binutils, stop posting all of these and lets all just get along fine, OK?

-JL

grab the popcorn, watching the freakshow.

What the hell do you all have something with the word "hypocritical"? Is it magic or something?

01000101 wrote:no offense JamesM, but isn't this entire post a little hypocritical?

JamesM wrote:And, if you expect me to 'commit', why be so hypocritical and do the opposite yourself?

Brynet-Inc wrote:This is how you're hypocritical.

I would recommend to lock this threed.

Regards
inflater

"hypocritical" means to say one thing and do another.

I would recommend to lock this threed.

Agreed.