Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:41 am
by Neo
Brynet-Inc wrote: Its Was a joke, to see how many C programmers i could get to visit my new site with jokes about C programmers :lol: http://hunger.hu/win.html
Worked fine in IE7, not if firefox 2.0 though :(
Wait a sec... yeah fine in FF2.0 too.

IE7 scaled it down though (thats why I didn't see it in FF).

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 1:45 pm
by omin0us
why does this only work sometimes? it has only crashed my machine once. but probably 95 percent of the time it does nothing?
how can this be reproduced all the time?

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 1:56 pm
by Cheery
Brendan wrote:Hi, What sort of programmer takes a value from anywhere on the internet, and then allocates memory based on this "value from anywhere" without first checking if that value is within a suitable range?
Well... According to that one, I guess MS programmer! :twisted:

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:44 pm
by chase
omin0us wrote:why does this only work sometimes? it has only crashed my machine once. but probably 95 percent of the time it does nothing?
how can this be reproduced all the time?
For some reason the idea of someone sitting there hitting refresh just trying to make their machine crash cracks me up.

It might just be that the page and image aren't loading so nothing is getting scaled up. The site seems a little slow at times.

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:01 am
by Dex
Dew to new Legislation in the UK, by my **** government, from Wednesday i could be imprisoned for up to 10 years, for posting the page, which i have removed.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p ... .html#j381

Even help or posting code could lead to imprisoned.
This to me makes DRM illegal in the UK, But than my government will always back big business other normal (?) people.

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:06 pm
by Midas
Dex wrote:Dew to new Legislation in the UK, by my **** government, from Wednesday i could be imprisoned for up to 10 years, for posting the page, which i have removed.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p ... .html#j381

Even help or posting code could lead to imprisoned.
This to me makes DRM illegal in the UK, But than my government will always back big business other normal (?) people.
I'm failing to see that particular part (the intent to impair or damage punishments) of the bill as being a bad thing? In any case, this was a bit immature. :roll: However, posting code and sharing code shouldn't be banned. If I want to screw about with the code on my own computer, that's not a problem. It can be interesting, and highlight issues.

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:25 pm
by Dex
See the ** ** here:
 For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) above the requisite intent is an
25
intent to do the act in question and by so doing-
(a)
** to impair the operation of any computer,**
(b)
to prevent or hinder access to any program or data held in any
computer,
(c)
** to impair the operation of any such program or the reliability of
30
any such data,**
** whether permanently or temporarily.**
I also see nothing wrong with pointing out that your browser is S**t, many be if i had shown how easy it is, to make a CD drive unusable by click on the wrong link, you could moan.

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:21 pm
by inflater
For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) above the requisite intent is an
25
intent to do the act in question and by so doing-
(a)
** to impair the operation of any computer,**
(b)
to prevent or hinder access to any program or data held in any
computer,
(c)
** to impair the operation of any such program or the reliability of
30
any such data,**
** whether permanently or temporarily.**
Well,I think that this is not present in Slovak Republic Law Digest :D

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:02 pm
by Candy
For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) above the requisite intent is an intent to do the act in question and by so doing—

to prevent or hinder access to any program or data held in any computer
Sue MI5 for using encryption?

[edit] It's amazing how they can make a hacking law that applies to MI5 as hackers but not to script kiddies. You are required to know what you do before you're liable.[/edit]

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:23 pm
by Midas
Dex wrote:See the ** ** here:
 For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) above the requisite intent is an
25
intent to do the act in question and by so doing-
(a)
** to impair the operation of any computer,**
(b)
to prevent or hinder access to any program or data held in any
computer,
(c)
** to impair the operation of any such program or the reliability of
30
any such data,**
** whether permanently or temporarily.**
I also see nothing wrong with pointing out that your browser is S**t, many be if i had shown how easy it is, to make a CD drive unusable by click on the wrong link, you could moan.
I'm just ticked because I didn't save an essay and lost it :lol: I can't choose my browser at school. Anyway, teaches me not to read forums when I'm meant to be doing other stuff.

You lured people into crashing their computers, losing any open data... That's a bit off, tbh.

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:32 pm
by Dex
You lured people into crashing their computers, losing any open data... That's a bit off, tbh.
I did not know it would do that, i am just a beginner :cry: