OS / WM Choices.

All off topic discussions go here. Everything from the funny thing your cat did to your favorite tv shows. Non-programming computer questions are ok too.
Post Reply
User avatar
elderK
Member
Member
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:54 am
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Contact:

OS / WM Choices.

Post by elderK »

Hey people,

Recently I have suffered a !@#$up on my main machine (My beloved laptop...) and, whilst installing Linux I decided "Hey, why not try something different..".

I am sick of linux, marginally sick of GNOME and I loath KDE. So, Im in a bit of a pickle.

Blackbox is fine, if you want minimal, as is WindowMaker but both lack the weird 'together' feel of KDE or GNOME.

So, Im looking at the BSDs. Net, Open, Free, Dragonfly.. oh, so many to choose from and, I need your help!

What OS / WM combination should I choose, for a nice, minimalistic but functional Development system.

What I am seeking in a combo...
- Looks nice in a minimalistic way. (Read as: I dont want !@#$ing eyecandy but I would like a refined ui).
- OS should support recent hardware, particularly Intel ICH7/8 chipset.
- Should be fast and NOT be bloated.
- Stable.
- Support the usual stock development tools (gcc, make, ld yadda yadda yadda...)
- Be relatively kind on the download size.
- Tolerable boot time. (Linux was okay with this).

I cant make my mind up. :(
~zeii.
User avatar
Alboin
Member
Member
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Noricum and Pannonia

Post by Alboin »

OpenBSD and Blackbox is probably the most stable, minimalistic thing I can think of.

There's also xfce on FreeBSD, which has a nice UI, and is mostly minimalistic.

This is a pretty good list of UI's.

Even though it's Linux, Gentoo is minimalistic and I have found it to be very fast. (Mine boots to a prompt in a little over a minute, and the programs themselves are very quick.) Also, it allows you to pick and choose what you want, leaving to little bloat.
C8H10N4O2 | #446691 | Trust the nodes.
TheQuux
Member
Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:49 pm

Post by TheQuux »

Linux/FVWM are awesome. Nothing else I've found is quite usable for development.

On the other hand, somebody I know swears by Solaris/CDE...
My project: Xenon
User avatar
elderK
Member
Member
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:54 am
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Contact:

Post by elderK »

I tend to use Slackware (whatever is the latest version at the time), with Blackbox.

But, Im a little sick of Linux in general.

~zeii.
User avatar
binutils
Member
Member
Posts: 214
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 6:07 am

Post by binutils »

I am using plan9port
http://swtch.com/plan9port/

need xterm
http://invisible-island.net/xterm/

in .xinitrc
exec rio -term xterm
User avatar
mystran
Member
Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:08 am

Post by mystran »

But without Beryl you can't have a nice spinning desktop cube and wobbly windows? :P
The real problem with goto is not with the control transfer, but with environments. Properly tail-recursive closures get both right.
anon19287473
Member
Member
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:27 pm

Re: OS / WM Choices.

Post by anon19287473 »

zeii wrote:Hey people,

Recently I have suffered a !@#$up on my main machine (My beloved laptop...) and, whilst installing Linux I decided "Hey, why not try something different..".

I am sick of linux, marginally sick of GNOME and I loath KDE. So, Im in a bit of a pickle.

Blackbox is fine, if you want minimal, as is WindowMaker but both lack the weird 'together' feel of KDE or GNOME.

So, Im looking at the BSDs. Net, Open, Free, Dragonfly.. oh, so many to choose from and, I need your help!

What OS / WM combination should I choose, for a nice, minimalistic but functional Development system.

What I am seeking in a combo...
- Looks nice in a minimalistic way. (Read as: I dont want !@#$ing eyecandy but I would like a refined ui).
- OS should support recent hardware, particularly Intel ICH7/8 chipset.
- Should be fast and NOT be bloated.
- Stable.
- Support the usual stock development tools (gcc, make, ld yadda yadda yadda...)
- Be relatively kind on the download size.
- Tolerable boot time. (Linux was okay with this).

I cant make my mind up. :(
~zeii.

Use OpenBSD as the OS (any OS where 'N' is the default for "Will you be using X?" has got to be minimalist) with one of the following window managers

ratpoison http://www.nongnu.org/ratpoison/
dwm http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm
stumpwm http://www.nongnu.org/stumpwm/
evilwm http://www.6809.org.uk/evilwm/
Speewave
Member
Member
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:11 pm
Location: The USA
Contact:

Post by Speewave »

i was happy with a FreeBSD. it lacked alot of things sadly :( like my WiFi Card. and for a dumb reason X wasn't compatable on my PC under BSD but in ubuntu it was
Post Reply