A idea for natural flow of conversation.

All off topic discussions go here. Everything from the funny thing your cat did to your favorite tv shows. Non-programming computer questions are ok too.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kevin McGuire
Member
Member
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 12:00 am
Location: United States
Contact:

A idea for natural flow of conversation.

Post by Kevin McGuire »

A Idea For The Natural Flow Of Conversation In A Forum While Maintaining On-Topic Conversation.

I was thinking just a few seconds ago, and yes in some rare moments the gears and sprokets do start turning the right direction in my brain.

About the way we do conversation on this forum. You know it seems often we end up going off-topic. I even find myself at times about to make a post or thinking of making one and realizing that I would be going off-topic too much.

However the truth being that most of the time it is not so much as going off-topic as it is just attaching a separate but related thread of conversation. I wish we had some really advanced forum software out there that could allow this type of natural flow while still leaving the main thread intact.

Maybe allowing the user to use a "Make Branch" button so that two conversation end points would be created instead of overriding one end point for the sake of another.

But at that same time I can start to have a hard time imagining a visual concept that could accommodate this functionality in a useful way. Maybe something more graphical with a tree look to it with sections that become compressed in between the origin node and the branch and ending points.

Code: Select all

What are some good ideas for memory management?
                                |
                             (post) --> (branch) "XYZ in my opinion is not good."
                                |                                             |
                             (post)                                     (post)
                                |                                         (post)
                              (post) ---> (branch) "You use GCC for you're kernel?"
                                                                          |
                                                                      (post)
                                                                      (post)
                                                                      (post)
supagu
Member
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 am

Post by supagu »

so something like the slashdot.org comments/forum
User avatar
mystran
Member
Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:08 am

Post by mystran »

I think just starting a new thread is a good solution. "Threaded" conversations (replies in a tree-like order) sound great in theory, but IMHO they are really painful to use in practice.
The real problem with goto is not with the control transfer, but with environments. Properly tail-recursive closures get both right.
User avatar
Brynet-Inc
Member
Member
Posts: 2426
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:29 pm
Libera.chat IRC: brynet
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by Brynet-Inc »

I hate the "slashdot" style of comments/forum.. It's considerably lame and hard to follow.

So many hidden posts.. Very easy to get lost :P

I wouldn't like such a transition of OSDev forums.. :?
Image
Twitter: @canadianbryan. Award by smcerm, I stole it. Original was larger.
User avatar
chase
Site Admin
Posts: 710
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Libera.chat IRC: chase_osdev
Location: Texas
Discord: chase/matt.heimer
Contact:

Post by chase »

I installed the topic split modification for phpbb here so mods can split the topics if they change topic too much.
User avatar
Candy
Member
Member
Posts: 3882
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Eindhoven

Post by Candy »

Brynet-Inc wrote:I hate the "slashdot" style of comments/forum.. It's considerably lame and hard to follow.

So many hidden posts.. Very easy to get lost :P

I wouldn't like such a transition of OSDev forums.. :?
The concept is nice but it wasn't implemented properly. The new slashdot thing is a lot better (you can uncollapse stuff without going to a subpage) but it's 1. too slow and 2. still clunky since you can barely collapse stuff again.

I think it could work a lot better.
User avatar
mystran
Member
Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:08 am

Post by mystran »

Threaded discussion is a "necessary evil" for forums like Slashdot that can accumulate hundreds of posts in a few hours. With low-traffic forums like ours, I don't see a point.
The real problem with goto is not with the control transfer, but with environments. Properly tail-recursive closures get both right.
User avatar
Kevin McGuire
Member
Member
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 12:00 am
Location: United States
Contact:

Post by Kevin McGuire »

You might be right on that one in it being a necessary evil for sites that can accumulate hundreds of posts.
Post Reply