What firewall is better to install?
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:24 am
- Location: far space
- Contact:
What firewall is better to install?
I have the firewall that came with my windows xp. I want a better one. What is a VERY good firewall i can download and use for free that dosen't slow down my computer?
I've never really played around with firewalls before (Using linux and all) but the free country has a page of free firewalls. here.
Hope one of them suits your needs.
Hope one of them suits your needs.
C8H10N4O2 | #446691 | Trust the nodes.
- Combuster
- Member
- Posts: 9301
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
- Libera.chat IRC: [com]buster
- Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
- Contact:
Given that most free firewalls are very poor, and paid firewalls usually do more than you want them to do, a decent NAT router is the easiest solution. Its the only 'firewall' I use and need. Plus that you can connect several computers to the internet at once.
Also from experience, DONT GET NORTON PERSONAL FIREWALL 2005. Its broken.
Also from experience, DONT GET NORTON PERSONAL FIREWALL 2005. Its broken.
- Brynet-Inc
- Member
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:29 pm
- Libera.chat IRC: brynet
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
I myself use an OpenBSD router, OpenBSD's firewall pf is very nice.
But yes, A hardware router like ones from D-Link or linksys are usually better then most software solutions.. I used a D-Link DI-604 previously.
Once your LAN is using a local IP range... Software firewalls can be rather pointless. (Unless you want to limit outgoing traffic.. but it can also be done on most routers)
(NAT ranges include 192.168.x.x, 172.16.x.x through 172.31.x.x, and 10.x.x.x)
The above IP ranges are only accessibly on private networks.. not via the Internet
But yes, A hardware router like ones from D-Link or linksys are usually better then most software solutions.. I used a D-Link DI-604 previously.
Once your LAN is using a local IP range... Software firewalls can be rather pointless. (Unless you want to limit outgoing traffic.. but it can also be done on most routers)
(NAT ranges include 192.168.x.x, 172.16.x.x through 172.31.x.x, and 10.x.x.x)
The above IP ranges are only accessibly on private networks.. not via the Internet
- kataklinger
- Member
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Serbia
Guide to making a really strong firewall -
Cut the telephone wire with your scissors and you will be protected against any attacks from Internet.
(just kidding)
inflater
Cut the telephone wire with your scissors and you will be protected against any attacks from Internet.
(just kidding)
inflater
My web site: http://inflater.wz.cz (Slovak)
Derrick operating system: http://derrick.xf.cz (Slovak and English )
Derrick operating system: http://derrick.xf.cz (Slovak and English )
- Brynet-Inc
- Member
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:29 pm
- Libera.chat IRC: brynet
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Norton everything is broken by design. They're designed around making you feel perfectly safe when they're operational and licensed (and paid for).Combuster wrote:Given that most free firewalls are very poor, and paid firewalls usually do more than you want them to do, a decent NAT router is the easiest solution. Its the only 'firewall' I use and need. Plus that you can connect several computers to the internet at once.
Also from experience, DONT GET NORTON PERSONAL FIREWALL 2005. Its broken.
Personally, I prefer to use my ultra fast WINDOWS special ops internet!Brynet-Inc wrote:If I did that.. I'd just be without a phone.. *Points to 20mbit cable Internet*inflater wrote:Guide to making a really strong firewall -
Cut the telephone wire with your scissors and you will be protected against any attacks from Internet.
(just kidding)
inflater
Just kidding. *Points to Linux box*
C8H10N4O2 | #446691 | Trust the nodes.
- Brynet-Inc
- Member
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:29 pm
- Libera.chat IRC: brynet
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Hmm.... hadn't noticed, to be honest. I removed the 3 URL references in the message (two of which linked a dot to his page, one which linked the unhappy smiley to his page - what kind of advertising is that?). Chase, can you remove his webpage from his profile?Brynet-Inc wrote:Doh!.. He's right *whistles* the poster appears to be a spambotniteice wrote:Am I the only person that noticed that this is a subtle spambot?
*Points to his URL*
*Shakes fist in anger... waisting my time..*
Wow Brynet-Inc, you have a 20-mbits internet? I think there is some spam bot...
inflater
inflater
My web site: http://inflater.wz.cz (Slovak)
Derrick operating system: http://derrick.xf.cz (Slovak and English )
Derrick operating system: http://derrick.xf.cz (Slovak and English )