DynatOS Basic Release (20060914)

This forums is for OS project announcements including project openings, new releases, update notices, test requests, and job openings (both paying and volunteer).
Post Reply
DynatOS

DynatOS Basic Release (20060914)

Post by DynatOS »

This basic release of DynatOS is to help determine if proper memory management is being initialized amongst different IA32 platforms. Basically, it is a user-feedback test with very little interaction capability in order to test the stability of the kernel. What I need the most is feedback from the "mem" command, but if it doesn't even boot up that far... please let me know :)

I already know how this test version works on emulators such as Bochs, VirtualPC and VMWare. I would greatly appreciate feedback/replies to this thread from anyone who downloads and runs this test version on a Real PC.

Features
-Command Line Interface (extremely basic, QWERTY scancode response)
-Runs in Protected Mode w/ Ring-3 Context Switch capability (base for later)
-Accepts 3 commands, "help", "clear" and "mem"

Requirements for Testing
-Intel 386 Compatible PC or Higher
-Floppy Disk Drive (and a blank floppy)
-Keyboard
-Monitor

Installation
-Download from link below
-Install on a standard 3.44 Floppy Disk using RawWrite (Windows), DD (*nix/Linux/BSD) or some other equivalent program. It can be written to a bootable CD such as Nero, but I wouldn't want anyone to do so unless it is a CD-RW (no loss, this test isn't worth wasting a CD-R over).

Outlook
-Keep releasing this test version until Memory Management Initialization Bugs are fixed
-Implement (enable) Memory Management capability
-Implement basic Process Management capability
-Design a few more hard-coded commands and loadable programs

Download Link
-----> http://www.dynatos.org/project/dynatos-20060914.bin <-----
User avatar
Kevin McGuire
Member
Member
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 12:00 am
Location: United States
Contact:

Re:DynatOS Basic Release (20060914)

Post by Kevin McGuire »

VMWare Workstation (Linux/5.5.1)
Memory: 32 MB
Hard Disk (SCSI 0:0): 1024MB
Floppy: (using bin downloaded)
Processor: Intel Celeron Mobile 2.6GHZ

I also tried 256 MB of memory, and the same result.

The screen blanked after showing the BIOS message, and stayed blanked. I waited no longer than 15 to 20 seconds.
DynatOS

Re:DynatOS Basic Release (20060914)

Post by DynatOS »

I was aware of results on all Emulators (including VMWare). The "blank screen" issue results from the old-old-old-old Video Initialization routine that depends on the CMOS values. Since that basic release (yours is not the first complaint), I changed it to rely on the BDA instead.

Thanks for testing anyhow. If you have any test results from a real computer, please let me know :)
User avatar
Combuster
Member
Member
Posts: 9301
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Libera.chat IRC: [com]buster
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
Contact:

Re:DynatOS Basic Release (20060914)

Post by Combuster »

I ran a test on my dual-p2 box "Io", and i was able to boot it.
However, the output of 'mem' doesnt really seem to match the actual hardware. (unless thats for a reason...)

screendump:
[pre]
<sys://> mem

------------------------------
| Memory Information |
------------------------------

Total Memory: 131272 KB
Physical Memory: 130048 KB
Available Memory: 129916 KB

<sys://>[/pre]
Physical memory reads as 127 MB (theres 128 installed, maybe the first 1 MB is ignored?)
Total Memory reads as 128.2 MB which doesnt sound correct either. (i tried some random thoughts but i cant reconstruct this number from anything)

Full specs of Io
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]
SpooK
Member
Member
Posts: 260
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:21 pm

Post by SpooK »

Sorry for the delayed response, I've been gone awhile.

Thanks for testing it out.

For Physical Memory, the hole at the 15-16 MB Mark is ignored. Since you don't have any means of "getting it back", it is simply not counted.

There are still a few things I have to do to tweak the memory detection process. The biggest one is detecting for overlapping E820 entries, which I think might be occurring with your example since it is 200KB above 128MB.

At any rate, the detection routine seems to be working in general... so that allows me to proceed on to fixing and adding other things :)

Once again, thanks for testing it out ;)
Post Reply