Adblock.Eero R?nik wrote: I don't know why everyone uses Firefox, though.
Seriously. Having a normal news site not flashing around (pun intended) is a very good thing for your eyes and your concentration.
Well... if you disable all stuff that IE "extended" on the internet, it might be as safe as the rest. I expect it to be. However, for some IE exploits you have to disable javascript, which is something that makes it impossible to use most sites nowadays.It's not the safest, nor the fastest browser around. Even Internet Explorer can be safer than Firefox, after little patching and securing (IE is a lot faster anyway).
Mozilla is a very public thing, it publishes anything it finds and assigns it a normal rating according to the severity of the problem. It fixes these problems and is done with them.According to Symantec, Mozilla browsers are the buggiest around at the moment and Opera was supposed to be the most secure mainstream browser on PC. Why is it used so rarely, then?
Microsoft has public relations to care about. It doesn't publicise stuff it doesn't find dangerous enough, or assigns it a very low severity rating and ignores it. Look at the most recent IE exploit, which was for a 6 MONTH old bug, which was back then classified as not important. It could've been fixed before, but the bug count would've gone up.
If you use firefox, you're auto-immune for activex exploits and IE-only exploits. You are however more vulnerable for firefox-only exploits. Since IE exploits and activex exploits outnumber the firefox exploits, in a way it is true. It is however only true for the "safer" bit. It's still not "safe".I have a feeling that most of the people think that if they use Firefox, it magically makes the internet a safer place. It doesn't.