My new OS homepage

[bubach]

What do you think of my new homepage for my OS?
Like/dislike the design?
Link in sig.

/ Christoffer

[DennisCGc]

Hey,

Your website is looking great, clear and fast..
Also it doesn't have the ?page=./index bug (and I even tried ../index)
Well done, only a little fault:
Not enoght memory.
- Not enough memory.

As said before, it's looking good

Regards,

DennisCGc.

[bubach]

Spelling comes after design on my list..

I use "if" and "else if" in the php-file to determine witch page to show. then i "print 'bla';" them. no includes.

/ Christoffer

[Calum]

I know an MT user that has an OS webpage, although I'm sure that there are heaps www.sos.osdcom.info the design is great, the forum works well, and I like the Digg and CS/OS News feeds at the side... Undoubtedly it was made off a template, but it is still great. Your page looks good, but its a little boring yeah, check out www.sos.osdcom.info , it'll give you some great ideas. Thanks, cheers

[srg_13]

This man does not represent me in any way

-stephen

[Candy]

IIRC, direct advertising wasn't allowed.

[mystran]

IIRC, direct advertising wasn't allowed.

At least it's on the offtopic, and not in OSdev.

That said, I'm not that much offended by posts that advertise a site for an OS, provided that:
1. that is done exactly once
2. that is done by, or with authority of, the project leader

Violating 1 is spam. Violating 2 is mainly a question of not embarrassing anyone else, but also greatly contributes to accidential violations of 1.

Besides, one can advertise in signatures just fine.