2^?

All off topic discussions go here. Everything from the funny thing your cat did to your favorite tv shows. Non-programming computer questions are ok too.
Mikemk
Member
Member
Posts: 409
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:27 pm

2^?

Post by Mikemk »

What is your favorite power of 2?
Programming is 80% Math, 20% Grammar, and 10% Creativity <--- Do not make fun of my joke!
If you're new, check this out.
User avatar
Nessphoro
Member
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:50 am

Re: 2^?

Post by Nessphoro »

The power of magic.
User avatar
VolTeK
Member
Member
Posts: 815
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: The Fire Nation

Re: 2^?

Post by VolTeK »

.5
User avatar
iansjack
Member
Member
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:07 am
Location: Chichester, UK

Re: 2^?

Post by iansjack »

-i
Antti
Member
Member
Posts: 923
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:12 am
Location: Finland

Re: 2^?

Post by Antti »

I usually think about the bit pattern.

Code: Select all

	00000001	Quite OK
	00000100	Bad
	00001000	OK
	10000000	Nice
Let's just say 128.
Mikemk
Member
Member
Posts: 409
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:27 pm

Re: 2^?

Post by Mikemk »

iansjack wrote:-i
Wouldn't that be 1?
Programming is 80% Math, 20% Grammar, and 10% Creativity <--- Do not make fun of my joke!
If you're new, check this out.
User avatar
AJ
Member
Member
Posts: 2646
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:01 am
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: 2^?

Post by AJ »

m12 wrote:Wouldn't that be 1?
Only if i was zero and then you don't need the minus sign ;)
Mikemk
Member
Member
Posts: 409
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:27 pm

Re: 2^?

Post by Mikemk »

I thought you meant i as in √(-1). the square root of √1 is 1, so logically -√(-1) = √1 = 1
Programming is 80% Math, 20% Grammar, and 10% Creativity <--- Do not make fun of my joke!
If you're new, check this out.
User avatar
Nessphoro
Member
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:50 am

Re: 2^?

Post by Nessphoro »

You can't just multiply by negative 1 to covert complex-real numbers
User avatar
iansjack
Member
Member
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:07 am
Location: Chichester, UK

Re: 2^?

Post by iansjack »

2 to the power of -i is most definitely not 1! (And -i is most definitely not 1 either.)
User avatar
bluemoon
Member
Member
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 3:41 am
Location: Hong Kong

Re: 2^?

Post by bluemoon »

Why not? 0 + i and 0 - i are valid complex numbers.

By the way, how about 2^e
CWood
Member
Member
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 1:21 pm

Re: 2^?

Post by CWood »

pi-th root of 2 (2^(1/pi))

I'm sure there will be some of you who get the reference
User avatar
Griwes
Member
Member
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:07 am
Libera.chat IRC: Griwes
Location: Wrocław/Racibórz, Poland
Contact:

Re: 2^?

Post by Griwes »

m12 wrote:I thought you meant i as in √(-1). the square root of √1 is 1, so logically -√(-1) = √1 = 1
This is one of the most frequent problems with understanding complex numbers. i IS NOT sqrt(-1). This is NOT its definition. x = sqrt(-1) is NOT i.

i is defined as follows:

i^2 = -1

No other definition of i is correct, and all of them create the bullshit you wrote before, when you said -i = 1. -i is conceptually the same as (0, -1) in R2, which is *completely different thing* than 1, which is, again conceptually, (1, 0) in R2.


Please educate yourself on such basic things before diving into talking about it.
Reaver Project :: Repository :: Ohloh project page
<klange> This is a horror story about what happens when you need a hammer and all you have is the skulls of the damned.
<drake1> as long as the lock is read and modified by atomic operations
User avatar
AJ
Member
Member
Posts: 2646
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:01 am
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: 2^?

Post by AJ »

Hi,
Griwes wrote:i^2 = -1

No other definition of i is correct
i^6 = -1?

Cheers,
Adam
User avatar
Griwes
Member
Member
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:07 am
Libera.chat IRC: Griwes
Location: Wrocław/Racibórz, Poland
Contact:

Re: 2^?

Post by Griwes »

That ain't a definition. You used the fact that i^2 is -1, which is *the* definition, and you just used that fact to write (i^2)^3 = -1, which is the same as (-1)^3 = -1.
Reaver Project :: Repository :: Ohloh project page
<klange> This is a horror story about what happens when you need a hammer and all you have is the skulls of the damned.
<drake1> as long as the lock is read and modified by atomic operations
Locked