KDevelop 4
KDevelop 4
After my upgrade to Ubuntu 9.10 my installation of KDevelop 3 disappeared, and KDevelop 4 got installed (yes, it was probably in the list of the gazillion unsupported packages to be deinstalled, but anyway). Appart from it being "slightly" annoying that KDev4 is not compatible with project files from KDev3, I have a problem getting it to start my OS. In KDev3, I specified the name of a start script somewhere, and it worked. In KDev4, I try to add the script in a launch configuration, but when I add it as "Project target", though autocomplete finds the script, when I press "Execute" nothing happens. When I specify it with "Executable", and add the full path, autocomplete also finds the script, and when I press "Execute" I get an error message telling me that '' (that's two single quotes without anything in between, I think) cannot be found. So where and how do I specify that KDev4 must run my script when I press Execute?
JAL
JAL
Re: KDevelop 4
Isn't KDevelop 4 still in beta stage?
Have a look at this: Don’t install Ubuntu 9.10 if you want a stable KDevelop.
Have a look at this: Don’t install Ubuntu 9.10 if you want a stable KDevelop.
Re: KDevelop 4
Officially yes, but a) a product being in beta stage has never deterred Canonical from including it in Ubuntu, and b) KDevelop 3 is not being developed anymore (according to the home page), and not encouraged to install.Hobbes wrote:Isn't KDevelop 4 still in beta stage?
EDIT: Thanks for the link, missed it the first time.
JAL
Last edited by jal on Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: KDevelop 4
You probably should file some bugs in the Ubuntu bugtracker.
Re: KDevelop 4
Well, I doubt whether there's a bug involved. I probably have missed some setting or another, but the weird thing is that I cannot open the project settings, since they're grayed out in the menu. Probably another "feature". Sometimes I long for Visual Studio...Kevin wrote:You probably should file some bugs in the Ubuntu bugtracker.
JAL
Re: KDevelop 4
I use to do the same thing with KDevelop3. I didn't care much for KDevelop4 when it came out so I switched over. If all else fails you could try running it in an xterm if it gives you an option to enter a command line. Perhaps it just cannot parse the script on it's own.
Reserved for OEM use.
Re: KDevelop 4
Of course it's easy to start the script in a terminal, even from the built-in terminal in KDevelop. But I'd like to press the "execute" button and be done with it. Even the "run in external terminal" flag in the launch settings doesn't do anything. It just fails to start at all.Cognition wrote:I use to do the same thing with KDevelop3. I didn't care much for KDevelop4 when it came out so I switched over. If all else fails you could try running it in an xterm if it gives you an option to enter a command line. Perhaps it just cannot parse the script on it's own.
JAL
Re: KDevelop 4
Well, don't think it makes sense, but let's assume it's the intended behaviour... Then it's a usability bug.jal wrote:Well, I doubt whether there's a bug involved. I probably have missed some setting or another, but the weird thing is that I cannot open the project settings, since they're grayed out in the menu. Probably another "feature". Sometimes I long for Visual Studio...
Just file it, they can't bite you. The worst thing that can happen is that they close the report as invalid without a useful comment. Usually I'd expect that they either accept the bug or tell you what you're doing wrong.
Re: KDevelop 4
No, but they can scold me for not reading the manual and using beta software :).Kevin wrote:Just file it, they can't bite you.
JAL
Re: KDevelop 4
For not reading the manual? Maybe. For using beta software? Well, if they removed the stable version and decided to ship a broken beta version, they surely should support it at least...
Re: KDevelop 4
Yeah, in an ideal world :). I'll try and go find the manual, if there is one (which, unfortunately, is more likely "no" than "yes" for OOS).Kevin wrote:For using beta software? Well, if they removed the stable version and decided to ship a broken beta version, they surely should support it at least...
JAL