Not sure whether this is the right place.
I've tried to do an initial import a few times, and it ended up in the repository twice. Once erroneously and once under a wrong name. How do I rename / delete an import?
CVS import messing around
Re:CVS import messing around
If you're on Sourceforge you can't delete files yourself. Submit a support request asking your CVS to be wiped or whatever.
Pete
Pete
Re:CVS import messing around
Ok, you're right about the sf.net part.Pete wrote: If you're on Sourceforge you can't delete files yourself. Submit a support request asking your CVS to be wiped or whatever.
Pete
On another part, before I got it correctly imported, the import doesn't go deeper than a level or 2-3, which leaves out a lot of files in my case. How do I get it to include those files too?
Re:CVS import messing around
Hm, what do you mean? It is been a long time I've been using CVS (on SourceForge, too), but as long as I remember, my initial import imported _all_ files from the directory. What is the problem?
Re:CVS import messing around
I have a directory structure likeabless wrote: Hm, what do you mean? It is been a long time I've been using CVS (on SourceForge, too), but as long as I remember, my initial import imported _all_ files from the directory. What is the problem?
0.0.2/src/kernel/core/pager/map.c
in those cases, it misses out on any thing below core, so it might have seen the core dir itself, but it did not include those below it. It did include the files from kernel though
Re:CVS import messing around
Hm, that's weird, I think it is not supposed to do that. It worked fine with my source, maybe you should mail some Sourceforge-guy, I don't know.
Re:CVS import messing around
Sounds more like a client problem than SF. What program are you using?
Re:CVS import messing around
up to now the default cvs that is packaged with Slackware. I figured since slackware is programmer-oriented, and rumor has it advanced programmers use cvs, its cvs would probably be a working one or some other message would have been posted.Pete wrote: Sounds more like a client problem than SF. What program are you using?