.NET programming in Linux

Programming, for all ages and all languages.
redoktober
Member
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:58 am
Location: Gurgaon/New Delhi, India
Contact:

Re: .NET programming in Linux

Post by redoktober »

right!

fedora it is, then..


oh yeah, i forgot to tell you guys..

i took debian and wine 1.1.15 for a test drive.
it's worse than i thought.
the instant i started installing the .NET Framework 2.0, the box rebooted.
"Do you program in Assembly?" she asked. "NOP," he said.

"Intel Inside" is a Government Warning required by Law.
fara7at
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:48 am

Re: .NET programming in Linux

Post by fara7at »

There is also a mono included precompiled livecd called monoppix.
monoppix.com
User avatar
xvedejas
Member
Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:01 pm

Re: .NET programming in Linux

Post by xvedejas »

+1 for mono

Any of OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Arch, and Fedora ought to be fine. Personally I use Arch but I believe Novell makes pre-release binary packages for OpenSuSE.
redoktober
Member
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:58 am
Location: Gurgaon/New Delhi, India
Contact:

Re: .NET programming in Linux

Post by redoktober »

right.
got to dig up those DVDs...
"Do you program in Assembly?" she asked. "NOP," he said.

"Intel Inside" is a Government Warning required by Law.
brickhead20
Member
Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:17 pm

Re: .NET programming in Linux

Post by brickhead20 »

How about DotGNU?
redoktober
Member
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:58 am
Location: Gurgaon/New Delhi, India
Contact:

Re: .NET programming in Linux

Post by redoktober »

i've had a look at it.
while it's a pretty good opportunity to learn more about .net internals, it's still not ready for production the way mono is..
"Do you program in Assembly?" she asked. "NOP," he said.

"Intel Inside" is a Government Warning required by Law.
dude101
Member
Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:26 pm

Re: .NET programming in Linux

Post by dude101 »

MessiahAndrw wrote:
JohnnyTheDon wrote:I've never been a propenent of Microsoft, but CLR isn't a closed standard. In fact, its published with ECMA. IIRC Java isn't truly and open standard. I remember reading something about it technically being owned by Sun. Might be wrong, but either way CLR isn't closed.
Exactly, and judging by B.E's signature I say his reply was written out of hatred for MS rather than research...
Yup, typical nerd arrogance. Why don't people ever give MS the credit they deserve?
redoktober
Member
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:58 am
Location: Gurgaon/New Delhi, India
Contact:

Re: .NET programming in Linux

Post by redoktober »

Yup, typical nerd arrogance. Why don't people ever give MS the credit they deserve
'tis okay, man.
each man unto his own!
"Do you program in Assembly?" she asked. "NOP," he said.

"Intel Inside" is a Government Warning required by Law.
Post Reply