Socks v1

This forums is for OS project announcements including project openings, new releases, update notices, test requests, and job openings (both paying and volunteer).
Post Reply
User avatar
Firestryke31
Member
Member
Posts: 550
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Throw a dart at central Texas
Contact:

Socks v1

Post by Firestryke31 »

So, for the past week or so I decided to try my hand at writing a 512 byte OS. My restrictions were these:
Must be a FAT12 formatted floppy
Must still be recognized and writable by Windows
Must be able to accept user input for commands
Commands must be loaded from a certain directory and run
Must be able to run a certain program at startup

I wanted to also have a simple program signature check, but I'll do that if I can figure out how to further reduce the size of my code.

The CLI is very simple, and just rejects any input it doesn't recognize (Displayable ASCII, backspace, and enter), or input when the buffer is full.

A screenshot of Socks after the startup program has run (simply displays the text) and an echo command:
Image

The floppy image can be found here.

Socks has not yet been tested on RHW, due to lack of floppy drive.

Please post bugs here!
Owner of Fawkes Software.
Wierd Al wrote: You think your Commodore 64 is really neato,
What kind of chip you got in there, a Dorito?
User avatar
Firestryke31
Member
Member
Posts: 550
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Throw a dart at central Texas
Contact:

Re: Socks v1

Post by Firestryke31 »

So, I'm not entirely sure where to go with Socks now. With both the command line and the automatic program run on start up it makes a pretty good first stage boot loader, but what I have so far has so many cheats and shortcuts I'm not sure I could get it working on anything other than a FAT12 floppy, and maybe, possibly, a FAT16 hard drive. I also need to write some commands and whatnot to make it less useless, but that's not as fun as packing 2^64 features into 512 bytes. I also considered writing a game, but that's practically an OS in and of itself, especially on Socks with no support.

What should I do now? Try and make a FAT16 version? Something else?
Owner of Fawkes Software.
Wierd Al wrote: You think your Commodore 64 is really neato,
What kind of chip you got in there, a Dorito?
User avatar
01000101
Member
Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Socks v1

Post by 01000101 »

so your entire OS fits in 512 bytes?

it looks to me like you have about half of that in those text strings from your screenshot.
User avatar
Firestryke31
Member
Member
Posts: 550
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Throw a dart at central Texas
Contact:

Re: Socks v1

Post by Firestryke31 »

Actually, that's the auto-loaded external program. I just wanted to demonstrate one of Socks' features. Socks will load and run "/SEF/SOCKS.SEF" if it can find it, and continue happily along if it can't. This is to let me use it as a first stage bootloader later.

The strings actually total to:

Code: Select all

"Socks   "
"SEF"
"Pgm"
"Dsk"
" Err" + '\n' + '\r'
The first two of which are very multi-purpose.
Owner of Fawkes Software.
Wierd Al wrote: You think your Commodore 64 is really neato,
What kind of chip you got in there, a Dorito?
User avatar
Troy Martin
Member
Member
Posts: 1686
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:40 pm
Location: Langley, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Re: Socks v1

Post by Troy Martin »

So since the entire thing doesn't fit in 512 bytes, it's not really a 512-byte OS? Or can it run without the socks.sef?
Image
Image
Solar wrote:It keeps stunning me how friendly we - as a community - are towards people who start programming "their first OS" who don't even have a solid understanding of pointers, their compiler, or how a OS is structured.
I wish I could add more tex
User avatar
Firestryke31
Member
Member
Posts: 550
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Throw a dart at central Texas
Contact:

Re: Socks v1

Post by Firestryke31 »

It is capable of running without socks.sef. The one included simply clears the screen, prints the message, and returns to Socks. Unfortunately, I could only get Socks running in Bochs. it fails with (I think) a sector not found error on RHW, or at least on the one computer that I have that has a floppy drive. That reminds me, I need to update the disk image there.

Sadly, future versions of Socks are probably not going to fit in 512 bytes, due to the number of cheats I had to use in order to get Socks working for the floppy image. I've tried a LBA FAT32 version, but I barely have room to load socks.sef, much less have the CLI too. But I'm still going to continue development because it's a pretty nice first stage bootloader if I can get it working on RHW...
Owner of Fawkes Software.
Wierd Al wrote: You think your Commodore 64 is really neato,
What kind of chip you got in there, a Dorito?
Post Reply