Moving from Java to C++

Love4Boobies · Post by **Love4Boobies** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:45 am

Solar wrote:
i586coder wrote:you see, even JAVA still need programing language such assembly/C++ in some parts...
I find it quite amusing, in language arguments like these, that the Sun JVM is written in C++. There's a research project about a Java-written VM, but that hasn't hit mainstream yet (and I am pretty sure that some core components will still be written in, not just "any other compiled language", but C++).

I disagree. It would be silly to code an assembler in assembly. Are you saying assembly is BS?

JAAman · Post by **JAAman** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:42 am

Love4Boobies wrote: I disagree. It would be silly to code an assembler in assembly. Are you saying assembly is BS?

i would be careful what you say... there are people who believe that its not a real assembler if its not written in assembly...

Love4Boobies · Post by **Love4Boobies** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:49 am

JAAman wrote:
Love4Boobies wrote: I disagree. It would be silly to code an assembler in assembly. Are you saying assembly is BS?
i would be careful what you say... there are people who believe that its not a real assembler if its not written in assembly...

What would be the benefits? From what I can tell:

importability (you couldn't have cross-assemblers)
harder to maintain and easier for bugs to slip in
a lot more work

How's that for being productive?

DeletedAccount · Post by **DeletedAccount** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:56 pm

Hi,
I do not have an answer to your question . But there are people who think that writing in assembly language is more productive than using a High Level Language

.

Regards
Shrek

Combuster · Post by **Combuster** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:40 pm

writing in assembly language is more productive

If this applies to you, you'll already know it

OSDev.org

Moving from Java to C++

Re: Moving from Java to C++

Re: Moving from Java to C++

Re: Moving from Java to C++

Re: Moving from Java to C++

Re: Moving from Java to C++