Digitrix 0.03

This forums is for OS project announcements including project openings, new releases, update notices, test requests, and job openings (both paying and volunteer).
Post Reply
itisiuk
Member
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:46 pm

Digitrix 0.03

Post by itisiuk »

Just completed my microkernel and thought id post it for testing.

not able todo much yet but hopefully will be posting more versions soon.

the site is
http://code.google.com/p/digitrix/downloads/list

and the current download is

floppy.img

or try
http://digitrix.googlecode.com/files/floppy.img

:D
Craze Frog
Member
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:52 am

Re: Digitrix 0.03

Post by Craze Frog »

What does it do?
User avatar
inflater
Member
Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:32 am
Location: Slovakia
Contact:

Re: Digitrix 0.03

Post by inflater »

Wow. When comparing all these version numbers, I really should increase next version of Derrick from 0.0.2 to 0.1 ... :lol:. Why? I think I deserve it, it's too low ==>

Results from MS Virtual PC:
typing mode03: exception 1, opcode 0, k-eip C00008AF, cs 8, stackvm86 FD20
instruction pointer: 92F
mode12, mode13: graphics corruption
Left SHIFT key does a very weird thing... it repeats the currently typed character from keyboard.
NUMLOCK isn't supported.
+ more bugs, like backspace doesn't erase the character etc.

Results from Bochs:
mode12: displays a weird rectangle on the screen (that's supposed to do?)
mode13: another crash

et cetera et cetera...

Results from real machine: not worth the try

Regards
inflater
My web site: http://inflater.wz.cz (Slovak)
Derrick operating system: http://derrick.xf.cz (Slovak and English :P)
itisiuk
Member
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:46 pm

Re: Digitrix 0.03

Post by itisiuk »

Thanks, im busy tidying up the code at present so will look into things

i use qemu to test it and all works fine with none of the mentioned bugs.

only problem ive got is that when deleting text it does not remove it from the buffer.
Post Reply