Open Source Graphics Card
- zaleschiemilgabriel
- Member
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:58 am
Open Source Graphics Card
Finally, there is something for operating systems developers who want to have graphics card drivers without using the BIOS. OGD1 is a graphics board designed by the open source community named Open Graphics Project.
Here's more info, on the subject:
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=OGD1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Graphics_Project
They take pre-orders on the product. I wonder if they will deliver the product worldwide once it's finished.
Here's more info, on the subject:
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=OGD1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Graphics_Project
They take pre-orders on the product. I wonder if they will deliver the product worldwide once it's finished.
- zaleschiemilgabriel
- Member
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:58 am
AMD/ATI only have specifications/code for X.org. I wouldn't consider that open-source. Anyway, I noticed the OGD1 pre-order was for the development kit and it costs $1500. That's way out of my budget. If ATI/AMD provide a good enough specification, I'm game. Does anyone have a link to this alleged specification or is it not out yet?
- Combuster
- Member
- Posts: 9301
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
- Libera.chat IRC: [com]buster
- Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
- Contact:
Mr Z. has returned. There goes my peaceful life
As for the facts:
OGD existed well before AMD released their specs. They just never got ground since the black sheep in the GPU market already have opened up docs (Voodoo, Intel, Via). After AMD, the primary goal of this project has been eliminated.
Given the time they are around and the fact they haven't reached any noteworthy status, I wouldn't even want to bother.
As for the AMD docs, they are publicly available from the X.org website, and there have been many posts about them here.
Edit: Their homepage also got NSFW content .
As for the facts:
OGD existed well before AMD released their specs. They just never got ground since the black sheep in the GPU market already have opened up docs (Voodoo, Intel, Via). After AMD, the primary goal of this project has been eliminated.
Given the time they are around and the fact they haven't reached any noteworthy status, I wouldn't even want to bother.
As for the AMD docs, they are publicly available from the X.org website, and there have been many posts about them here.
Edit: Their homepage also got NSFW content .
- Brynet-Inc
- Member
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:29 pm
- Libera.chat IRC: brynet
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
These links have been posted here, "AND EVERYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET" about 50 billion (and 2..) times..zaleschiemilgabriel wrote:Does anyone have a link to this alleged specification or is it not out yet?
http://ati.amd.com/developer/open_gpu_d ... ation.html
http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/
They're hardly "Xorg centric"..
Anyway, The purpose of the Open Graphics Project is to produce a graphics card that not only has open software specifications, but hardware as well..
- Brynet-Inc
- Member
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:29 pm
- Libera.chat IRC: brynet
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
I think the cost comes in as a result of FPGA's vs ASIC, the design of the card allows users to actually "modify" and tweak the card to their hearts desire..Keiyentai wrote:The idea and concept are cool but the price for the performance is a little...high. $1500 for a card that performs at the rate of a Radeon 7000? Little much I think.
It's a card for developers after all... I'm sure they could cut manufacturing costs, but the end result probably wouldn't be very fun to tinker with..