IDE :D

xyjamepa · Post by **xyjamepa** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:56 pm

Notepad also now i'm using Bloodshed Dev-C++.

cg123 · Post by **cg123** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:40 pm

I'm actually using a makefile on a FAT32 drive shared between XCode, Visual Studio 2005 Express, and Code::Blocks.. I frequently feel too lazy to reboot into Linux to work on my OS.

bucket_brigade · Post by **bucket_brigade** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:33 am

emacs

t6q4 · Post by **t6q4** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:37 am

I use Notepad++ for my IDE and I've written a batch file to do my compiling dirty work. I like Notepad++ because it supports colour-coding for a variety of different programing languages, so I can make ASM Batch C and many more types of files without a separate IDE for each.

eddyb · Post by **eddyb** » Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:29 am

VC++
Iz tza best $\:D/$

Dex · Post by **Dex** » Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:55 am

I use "IDEx.dex" a IDE that runs on my OS.

lukem95 · Post by **lukem95** » Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:06 am

01000101 wrote:I use Dev/C++ IDE for all my coding.
The adjustable tabbing feature makes my code look much neater.
and I use it for the project file tree.

i do that, but organise the tree using windows explorer (h)

and ms vc++ for asm (cos its default).

jzgriffin · Post by **jzgriffin** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:08 pm

Bash, Gnome-Terminal (URxvt's copy/paste finally drove me away), Gedit, GVim, Vim (when X is turned off), make, gcc, g++, binutils, nasm, fasm, Qemu, Bochs. True IDEs suck. If there's a "Build" thing that runs make, or a project/file browser, great, but when you put it all together, you get a slow, unorganized mess of menus and collapsible panels.

01000101 · Post by **01000101** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:42 pm

Jeremiah Griffin wrote:Bash, Gnome-Terminal (URxvt's copy/paste finally drove me away), Gedit, GVim, Vim (when X is turned off), make, gcc, g++, binutils, nasm, fasm, Qemu, Bochs. True IDEs suck. If there's a "Build" thing that runs make, or a project/file browser, great, but when you put it all together, you get a slow, unorganized mess of menus and collapsible panels.

yep... and color syntaxing.

I couldn't image writing an OS in just a terminal window... that seems a bit hectic.

Zacariaz · Post by **Zacariaz** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:46 pm

Notepad
N++
Bloodshed Dev-C++

jzgriffin · Post by **jzgriffin** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:53 pm

01000101 wrote:
Jeremiah Griffin wrote:Bash, Gnome-Terminal (URxvt's copy/paste finally drove me away), Gedit, GVim, Vim (when X is turned off), make, gcc, g++, binutils, nasm, fasm, Qemu, Bochs. True IDEs suck. If there's a "Build" thing that runs make, or a project/file browser, great, but when you put it all together, you get a slow, unorganized mess of menus and collapsible panels.
yep... and color syntaxing.

I couldn't image writing an OS in just a terminal window... that seems a bit hectic.

I did my 16-bit assembly OS + boot loader entirely without X. It was, actually, faster than it would have been with X.

As for being hectic, no way. If you're proficient with Screen and Vim, it's easy to stay organized and focused.

B.E · Post by **B.E** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:59 pm

I use VIM plus the vim command 'map #5 ^[:w ^M:make! run^M:cope 8^M' for command line Linux programming. And eclipse for java and VS for Windows.

This runs make run, if an error occurs during the compilation it goes to the line that the error occurred on and shows a description of the error, if no error occurs the compiled program runs and then the output of the program is then shown (if the output is in the correct format, you can trace the steps that the program took) which is mapped to F5.

Solar · Post by **Solar** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:56 am

Jeremiah Griffin wrote:
01000101 wrote:I couldn't image writing an OS in just a terminal window... that seems a bit hectic.
I did my 16-bit assembly OS + boot loader entirely without X. It was, actually, faster than it would have been with X.

As for being hectic, no way. If you're proficient with Screen and Vim, it's easy to stay organized and focused.

I usually run my shell-only tools in X / Konsole, but mostly because I like to have music or a movie playing in a small window, ICQ in the background etc. (Too little sensory input and I tend to get bored / sidetracked.) Everything else - switching terminals, syntax highlighting, edit / make / test / edit without leaving the editor etc., I could have on a non-X terminal too.

neon · Post by **neon** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:53 am

Visual C++, for both applications and OS dev

jzgriffin · Post by **jzgriffin** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:38 am

Solar wrote:I usually run my shell-only tools in X / Konsole, but mostly because I like to have music or a movie playing in a small window, ICQ in the background etc. (Too little sensory input and I tend to get bored / sidetracked.) Everything else - switching terminals, syntax highlighting, edit / make / test / edit without leaving the editor etc., I could have on a non-X terminal too.

That's what mpg321 and Finch are for!