Math question...(how many real numbers...)

All off topic discussions go here. Everything from the funny thing your cat did to your favorite tv shows. Non-programming computer questions are ok too.
Post Reply
earlz
Member
Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:00 pm
Contact:

Math question...(how many real numbers...)

Post by earlz »

Ok, I have been trying to figure this out, and even made a small program to try to figure it out, but after hours of running it and not finding anything that seemed to be "finished" I'll ask here...

How many triples of real numbers(x,y,z) are there such that xy=z, xz=y, and yz=x?
User avatar
Alboin
Member
Member
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Noricum and Pannonia

Post by Alboin »

Are there any?

Code: Select all

x = z/y
x = y/z
x = zy
Since z/y = y/z, mustn't z = y? Therefore, if my assumptions are correct, z/y and y/z would equal 1, which would then be x. However, zy can't then be x, can it?
C8H10N4O2 | #446691 | Trust the nodes.
frank
Member
Member
Posts: 729
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 2:31 pm
Location: East Coast, USA

Post by frank »

(1,1,1) I think
earlz
Member
Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:00 pm
Contact:

Post by earlz »

hmmm....1,1,1 does seem to be it...with their being only 1 solution...
User avatar
Candy
Member
Member
Posts: 3882
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Eindhoven

Post by Candy »

*cough*

(1, -1, -1)
(-1, 1, -1)
(-1, -1, 1)

Proof that these are all is fairly easy. For each of them, the magnitude must be equal to the magnitude of the two others multiplied -> the magnitude must be one for each. The direction for two must be either positive, different or negative, with a positive, negative or positive result (respectively). So, taking both positive gives a third positive, taking the first negative gives another negative, taking the second negative also gives another negative, taking both negative gives another positive. Four possibilities.
Osbios
Member
Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 11:00 pm

0?

Post by Osbios »

and 0, 0, 0? (not a real number?)
User avatar
Zacariaz
Member
Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:36 pm
Contact:

Post by Zacariaz »

0 is not a real numer, nor is -1. real numbers range from 1 - inf.

This is of course assuming that i understand the meaning of the work "real" correctly. In danish i would discribe it asw natural numbers.
This was supposed to be a cool signature...
User avatar
JamesM
Member
Member
Posts: 2935
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:27 am
Location: York, United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by JamesM »

In English they are also natural numbers.

Real numbers are numbers which do not contain a complex component (no imaginary part).

N -- the set of natural numbers (0, 1,2,3,4,5,6..)
Z -- the set of integers (-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4...)
W -- the set of rational numbers (1/3, 2/3, 1/4, 2/5, 6.0, 5.0 etc)
R -- the set of all real numbers. (1.123141233..., 3.1415926535..., 7, 5,...)
C -- the set of all complex numbers (3, 5, 4, 4.34, 3+4i, 3+7i, etc...)

Going down the list each is a superset of the last.
User avatar
Candy
Member
Member
Posts: 3882
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Eindhoven

Post by Candy »

Zacariaz wrote:0 is not a real numer, nor is -1. real numbers range from 1 - inf.
Real numbers are the numbers between -inf and +inf without imaginary parts. For each number in the real number set, there's an infinite number of real numbers between. Real numbers contain all rational numbers Q (any number from Z divided by any number from Z not equal to 0) and all the numbers between them that are not rational.

-1 and 1 are in Z (1 is in N, N union -N = Z)
So, -1/1 ( = -1) is in Q, so it is in R.
User avatar
JamesM
Member
Member
Posts: 2935
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:27 am
Location: York, United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by JamesM »

Dammit I put the rationals down as 'W' not 'Q' :(
User avatar
Candy
Member
Member
Posts: 3882
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Eindhoven

Post by Candy »

JamesM wrote:Dammit I put the rationals down as 'W' not 'Q' :(
Wikipedia says I'm right :)
User avatar
os64dev
Member
Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:21 pm
Location: Best, Netherlands

Post by os64dev »

Candy wrote:
JamesM wrote:Dammit I put the rationals down as 'W' not 'Q' :(
Wikipedia says I'm right :)
=D>

ps. ik ben een beetje melig
Author of COBOS
Post Reply