is Borland suitable

Programming, for all ages and all languages.
Post Reply
User avatar
MCC
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Australia

is Borland suitable

Post by MCC »

I am very interested in the Borland C/C++ Compiler, so I am asking for you guys to share your thoughts. Do you think the free compiler is suitable for developing an OS?

Are there any major drawbacks or advantages? Or general information regarding the tool.

Thanks :D
Microprocessor Computer Company
Top
Buck1000
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: Seatac, WA

Post by Buck1000 »

And how about Dev-C++?
Top
User avatar
Combuster
Member
Member
Posts: 9301
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Libera.chat IRC: [com]buster
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
Contact:
Contact Combuster

Post by Combuster »

Dev-C++ is an IDE, not an compiler :? (it uses GCC, in case you wonder)

As for Borland stuff, last thing I tried was TC3 which is 16-bit, so don't count on my expertise.
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]
Top
User avatar
neon
Member
Member
Posts: 1567
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:28 pm
Contact:
Contact neon

Post by neon »

Free compilier? Borland has alot of free compiliers...

Borland Builder 5 (Command line) can be used for Win32. Only generates 32 bit pmode code.

Turbo C 2.1 is a great compilier envirement for old DOS development, but can only generate 16 bit real mode code.

The last Borland compilier I used was TurboC 2.1, but that was only to create a small Mode 13h game for fun.

I believe Borland Builder 5 can be used in an OS envirement. I may be wrong here, though.
OS Development Series | Wiki | os | ncc
char c[2]={"\x90\xC3"};int main(){void(*f)()=(void(__cdecl*)(void))(void*)&c;f();}
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Programming”