I think it is worth to develop a simple kernel based
on XML. If you have any ideas about where to use
XML and for what purpose, share with me.
XML based Kernel
RE:XML based Kernel
>On 2002-01-29 13:50:18, Anonymous wrote:
>I think it is worth to develop a simple kernel based
>on XML. If you have any ideas about where to use
>XML and for what purpose, share with me.
I think the best use would be if your OS has an offical
application design configuration.
Personally one of the pet pevs I have with unix's is that
some applications use configuration files with spaces, others
use tabs, etc..
>I think it is worth to develop a simple kernel based
>on XML. If you have any ideas about where to use
>XML and for what purpose, share with me.
I think the best use would be if your OS has an offical
application design configuration.
Personally one of the pet pevs I have with unix's is that
some applications use configuration files with spaces, others
use tabs, etc..
RE:XML based Kernel
>On 2002-02-01 22:26:51, Chase wrote:
>>On 2002-01-29 13:50:18, Anonymous wrote:
>>I think it is worth to develop a simple kernel based
>>on XML. If you have any ideas about where to use
>>XML and for what purpose, share with me.
>
>I think the best use would be if your OS has an offical
>application design configuration.
>
>Personally one of the pet pevs I have with unix's is that
>some applications use configuration files with spaces, others
>use tabs, etc..
XML should be of some use for data transfer, but
I think it has far too much overhead for the use
in an OS kernel ...
>>On 2002-01-29 13:50:18, Anonymous wrote:
>>I think it is worth to develop a simple kernel based
>>on XML. If you have any ideas about where to use
>>XML and for what purpose, share with me.
>
>I think the best use would be if your OS has an offical
>application design configuration.
>
>Personally one of the pet pevs I have with unix's is that
>some applications use configuration files with spaces, others
>use tabs, etc..
XML should be of some use for data transfer, but
I think it has far too much overhead for the use
in an OS kernel ...