OSDev.org

When running w2k3 server for a while, my p3 500mhz is cool without a fan.
Strange part is, when im running my bootloader it gets hot as hell.

Could this be because of the loop?

Any ideas?

Here is a a simple bootloader which makes my processor get really hot:What can i do instead?

Kurdistan wrote:Could this be because of the loop?

Any ideas?

Insert an instruction to halt the processor (to reduce heat emission). Halt or something to that effect - reduce clock speed, etc.
I think you already know that running a processor that has a high heat dissipation factor without a proper cooling device will eventually damage it. You shouldn't be using it to... cook eggs on it, for example

Thanks for the help, i'll try it out.

This processor doesn't need a fan, it has a pretty big heat sink.
Have used this computer as a webserver for a few years without any problems =)

Use the HLT instruction when you're not doing anything to keep the CPU cold. When actively polling, using strings of PAUSE instructions or OUT 0edh, AL (a delay port implemented on many computers) might work.

Gigasoft wrote:OUT 0edh, AL (a delay port implemented on many computers) might work.

I've never heard about this delay port before. What's supposed to be in AL? I'm intrigued, can you point to a reference?

Only thing i found about out 0edh, al is "non existing port for delay".
It didn't work though, on vpc, my bootloader/kernel is still eating up the cpu.
halting didn't work ether, nether did PAUSE, the SSE2 instruction.

I haven't found any documentation for this delay port, but many BIOSes use it, and Linux also seems to use it. The byte written to it doesn't matter. Perhaps it's just a reserved port that doesn't get responded too, causing a standard I/O delay.

If HLT doesn't even work, then it's a mystery. You're sure you're executing it in a loop?

Hi,

Kurdistan wrote:Only thing i found about out 0edh, al is "non existing port for delay".
It didn't work though, on vpc, my bootloader/kernel is still eating up the cpu.
halting didn't work ether, nether did PAUSE, the SSE2 instruction.

If you mean that none of these made a significant difference to CPU temperature, then that's probably what you should expect...

Most CPUs have several different power saving modes; and usually the modes that save the most power/heat have the highest latency (e.g. take longer to enter the power saving mode, and take longer to leave the power saving mode). HLT has low latency (which is important to avoid effecting IRQ latency too much) which means that most of the CPU is still running (and not much power is saved).

It's possible (likely) that the CPU supports much more aggressive power saving modes (including things like flushing all caches and turning them off, reducing the core's voltage and frequency, etc); and it's also likely that Windows uses one or more of these more aggressive power saving modes.

PAUSE isn't intended to reduce power usage at all - it's intended for improving performance with hyper-threading (where a core's resources are shared by logical CPUs). Basically it stops a tight loop running on one logical CPU from filling up the core's pipeline (and making the other logical CPU run slower).

OUT is similar - it does create a delay, but doesn't turn any of the CPU off and doesn't reduce power usage.

For all of these, HLT should save the most power (but still nowhere near the amount of power that deeper power management states, etc would save; and probably not enough to cause the CPU fan to slow down much).

To use the deeper power management states you need to mess with (chipset specific) I/O ports and/or (CPU model specific) MSRs and/or APM and/or ACPI.


Cheers,

Brendan

Thanks for all the help!

The loop never got executed,
loop: hlt
jmp loop

But it worked now when i moved all the variable declaration to the end!

I got to protected mode now, so hlt doesn't work due to the privileges.

My code is using 100% of the cpu, when Im in real mode and use hlt (without cli) it stays below 2% when idle. Now it's 100% when idle.

What can i use or do instead so that my code doesn't use 100% of the cpu when idle?

Hi,

Kurdistan wrote:I got to protected mode now, so hlt doesn't work due to the privileges.

My code is using 100% of the cpu, when Im in real mode and use hlt (without cli) it stays below 2% when idle. Now it's 100% when idle.

What can i use or do instead so that my code doesn't use 100% of the cpu when idle?

If HLT doesn't work due to privileges, then your code should call the kernel (or something that can use HLT) and tell it that it has nothing else to do. For most OS's the kernel would switch to another task (if there's any other tasks that could run) or if that's not possible it'd HLT until something changes (and if nothing changes for a while, it might try deeper sleep states).


Cheers,

Brendan

I got to protected mode now, so hlt doesn't work due to the privileges.

You can still run hlt in protected mode, just not outside of ring0.

Kurdistan wrote:The loop never got executed,
loop: hlt
jmp loop

But it worked now when i moved all the variable declaration to the end!

Is NASM so stupid as to let you use opcode names for labels or the code didn't assemble because you weren't unaware you did this?

At least Yasm will not assemble that and throws back a syntax error

Thanks Brendan, i'll try that.

No, i used "loop" just for an example. NASM didn't alert a errormessage when i tried loop now. But that mistake was corrected.

And i thought i was in ring 0?
I just wrote:and then jump to a 32 bit area, with: