undefined reference to _main

ubergeek · Post by **ubergeek** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:50 pm

All right, so I'm trying to combine ASM and C++, and ld gives me an error:

undefined reference to _main

I'm using g++ and NASM. I did put "extern _main" in the ASM file.

Candy · Post by **Candy** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:00 pm

Do you have a function called _main?

ubergeek · Post by **ubergeek** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:26 pm

Yes, there is an

Code: Select all

int main()

function in the C++ file. (which compiles succesfully)

Brynet-Inc · Post by **Brynet-Inc** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:33 pm

Look at the symbols inside your C++ object with the nm command..

Tyler · Post by **Tyler** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:35 pm

Person 1: Do you have a fish?

Person 2: Yes, there's a rabbit over there.

Craze Frog · Post by **Craze Frog** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:38 pm

ubergeek wrote:Yes, there is an
Code: Select all
int main()
function in the C++ file. (which compiles succesfully)

Read about C++ name mangling: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangl ... in_C.2B.2B

os64dev · Post by **os64dev** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:50 pm

Tyler wrote:Person 1: Do you have a fish?
Person 2: Yes, there's a rabbit over there.

Might i inquire the reasoning of this remark? Lets try to keep on track. At one point in time you also would have learned about extern "C" before int main to compile C++ executables.

Woo how subtle sniffed in an answer in a friendly nudge.

Tyler · Post by **Tyler** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:56 pm

os64dev wrote:
Tyler wrote:Person 1: Do you have a fish?
Person 2: Yes, there's a rabbit over there.
Might i inquire the reasoning of this remark? Lets try to keep on track. At one point in time you also would have learned about extern "C" before int main to compile C++ executables.

Woo how subtle sniffed in an answer in a friendly nudge.

Well i was going to say objdump, but Brynet got in there and posted another method of actually checking the symbol name, so i just threw that in as a little joke post thinking that the topic would end there... apparenly not as funny as it sounded in my head...

Kudos on the answer in the form of a nostalgic statement!

piranha · Post by **piranha** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:49 pm

I had trouble with this too, and I fixed it by calling "main" not "_main" from the ASM file, and changing the extern statement to "main" from "_main"...maybe you could try that...

-JL

blound · Post by **blound** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:34 pm

gcc do not append the _ so im assuming g++ doesnt either

Solar · Post by **Solar** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:09 am

blound wrote:gcc do not append the _ so im assuming g++ doesnt either

GCC does whatever you told it in its configuration.

JamesM · Post by **JamesM** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:33 am

piranha wrote:I had trouble with this too, and I fixed it by calling "main" not "_main" from the ASM file, and changing the extern statement to "main" from "_main"...maybe you could try that...

-JL

The question has been answered already...

C++ mangles identifiers. extern "C" will fix it.

AJ · Post by AJ » Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:04 am

I don't think g++ mangles the name of the main function (as long as it is a traditional int main()) by default - I've followed the cross-compiler tutorials and that certainly leaves you with a compiler that produces the symbol 'main' whether or not you use extern "C".

Cheers,
Adam

bluecode · Post by **bluecode** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:48 am

The leading underscore has nothing to do with C++ name-mangling. It is possible to use the -fleading-underscore / -fno-leading-underscore option with gcc and g++ (iirc there is also a configure switch for that, look for yourself), look into the gcc manuals.

JamesM · Post by **JamesM** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 9:56 am

bluecode wrote:The leading underscore has nothing to do with C++ name-mangling. It is possible to use the -fleading-underscore / -fno-leading-underscore option with gcc and g++ (iirc there is also a configure switch for that, look for yourself), look into the gcc manuals.

I know this. What made you assume we didn't?