What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Excuse me, but do you have an English or French version of tyndur's doc ?
(As an aside, I always find amazing how fast projects are labelled "mature" or "amazing" as soon as they have something that looks like an UNIX shell or have some SDL port equivalent and disk handling implemented. I'm sure that even if my kernel implemented über-advanced IPC and object-oriented API for everything including the kernel, it would'nt get so much love unless I get some hacky VBE support running .kkrieger )
(As an aside, I always find amazing how fast projects are labelled "mature" or "amazing" as soon as they have something that looks like an UNIX shell or have some SDL port equivalent and disk handling implemented. I'm sure that even if my kernel implemented über-advanced IPC and object-oriented API for everything including the kernel, it would'nt get so much love unless I get some hacky VBE support running .kkrieger )
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Not really. Even in German there's not much documentation, in English the 0.2.2 release thread is probably the best description and for French... je ne parle pas français.Neolander wrote:Excuse me, but do you have an English or French version of tyndur's doc ?
That's true - because you can't see IPC on screenshots. A screenshot doesn't tell you much more than that the OS is able to get some pixels to the screen. The same screenshot could be produced by a very simplistic OS or a very advanced one. It's why I've never bothered posting here before. You need at least some crappy graphics mode stuff to get some interest.(As an aside, I always find amazing how fast projects are labelled "mature" or "amazing" as soon as they have something that looks like an UNIX shell or have some SDL port equivalent and disk handling implemented. I'm sure that even if my kernel implemented über-advanced IPC and object-oriented API for everything including the kernel, it would'nt get so much love unless I get some hacky VBE support running .kkrieger )
- NickJohnson
- Member
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:11 pm
- Location: Sunnyvale, California
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
I finally got a proper shell working! It requires seven concurrent processes (vfs, device manager, terminal driver, keyboard driver, initrd driver, init, and the shell itself), not to mention a multithreading microkernel with message passing and events, to do it, but it can execute arbitrary programs from a tar-based initrd with arguments. Elapsed time: 14 months.
Btw, the command is "acho" not "echo" because of a bug I'm still working out in the initrd driver - I've got it tracked down to the file offsets...
Edit: Fixed it.
Btw, the command is "acho" not "echo" because of a bug I'm still working out in the initrd driver - I've got it tracked down to the file offsets...
Edit: Fixed it.
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Well done. A microkernel !! I'm now jealous, wish mine were working.
Can I ask some questions.
1. Msgs are synchronous or asynchronous (i.e. does sendmsg block ?)
2. I'm interested in your driver architecture. Is 'term' your video driver ? And it's separate from your kdb driver?
- gerryg400
Can I ask some questions.
1. Msgs are synchronous or asynchronous (i.e. does sendmsg block ?)
2. I'm interested in your driver architecture. Is 'term' your video driver ? And it's separate from your kdb driver?
- gerryg400
If a trainstation is where trains stop, what is a workstation ?
- NickJohnson
- Member
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:11 pm
- Location: Sunnyvale, California
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
1. On the kernel level, asynchronous, with optional events on reception; however, most I/O waits for changes in message queues, which makes them synchronous. There's already support for "fragmented messages" (sorta like fragmented IP packets) which could take advantage of certain multithreaded drivers if I added more precise queue control, but it's too soon for that kind of optimization.
2. Yes, they're separate, and "term" is the text mode video driver. I don't know if that will stay that way forever though. I'm thinking of combining keyboard, mouse, and video drivers into one process, sort of like X11 does, except with a flatter (i.e. non-windowed) design, once I start on a GUI.
Also, I just realized that my architecture comes with a loopback device equivalent for free - I can mount any tar file in the initrd as its own filesystem by invoking the "tarfs" driver (used for the initrd) on that file. I tested it, and it works fine. Of course, once I add a real permission system it will get a bit hairier, but it's still awesome.
2. Yes, they're separate, and "term" is the text mode video driver. I don't know if that will stay that way forever though. I'm thinking of combining keyboard, mouse, and video drivers into one process, sort of like X11 does, except with a flatter (i.e. non-windowed) design, once I start on a GUI.
Also, I just realized that my architecture comes with a loopback device equivalent for free - I can mount any tar file in the initrd as its own filesystem by invoking the "tarfs" driver (used for the initrd) on that file. I tested it, and it works fine. Of course, once I add a real permission system it will get a bit hairier, but it's still awesome.
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Latest screen shot of BareMetal OS v0.4.8-dev
The top line is reserved for system status info. Currently it shows which CPU cores are active. A core is idle if it is black and active if it is flashing between gray and white.
While the smptest program was running all cores were lit up.
The top line is reserved for system status info. Currently it shows which CPU cores are active. A core is idle if it is black and active if it is flashing between gray and white.
While the smptest program was running all cores were lit up.
BareMetal OS - http://www.returninfinity.com/
Mono-tasking 64-bit OS for x86-64 based computers, written entirely in Assembly
Mono-tasking 64-bit OS for x86-64 based computers, written entirely in Assembly
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Each rectangle (frame) is drag-able. The mouse pointer there I made myself, by hand, pixel-by-pixel (I was bored). There is transparency (alpha-channel) as well. There are still a couple bugs, like if you move a box to the very left of the screen its color goes a bit off, and after dragging the mouse pointer momentarily disappears, but besides that it works great
Valix is an experiment in an interpreted userspace with object-oriented and functional design patterns. Developers needed! Join #valix on irc.freenode.net
-
- Member
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:46 pm
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Nice one ^
Here is my OS. Finally, keyboard driver 100% working, and a basic shell. WOHOO
Here is my OS. Finally, keyboard driver 100% working, and a basic shell. WOHOO
- Attachments
-
- my_os.PNG (10.66 KiB) Viewed 6084 times
Tibi,
Currently working on the Lux Operating System
Currently working on the Lux Operating System
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Code: Select all
Input> place
On you desk...
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Next job for that: implement GPSHobbes wrote:Now that is a command every shell should haveCode: Select all
Input> place On you desk...
This was one of the two ideas I had for my (yet-to-be-written) vfs system - to allow reading/writing archives (frex, 'cp foo bar.zip/x/foo' would be a valid command). I won't elaborate any further here, though, because then I'd be at risk of derailing the threadNickJohnson wrote:Also, I just realized that my architecture comes with a loopback device equivalent for free - I can mount any tar file in the initrd as its own filesystem by invoking the "tarfs" driver (used for the initrd) on that file. I tested it, and it works fine. Of course, once I add a real permission system it will get a bit hairier, but it's still awesome.
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
If I run this on my laptop, will it say "On your lap"?Hobbes wrote:Now that is a command every shell should haveCode: Select all
Input> place On you desk...
Valix is an experiment in an interpreted userspace with object-oriented and functional design patterns. Developers needed! Join #valix on irc.freenode.net
-
- Member
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:55 am
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Nick's OS (NOS):
I'll be going to RPI this fall so I made it school colors.. Fun.
Brodeur235
I'll be going to RPI this fall so I made it school colors.. Fun.
Brodeur235
my website: http://67.11.191.209/
my software: http://67.11.191.209/software
my OS: http://67.11.191.209/software/view.php? ... Synergy_OS
my software: http://67.11.191.209/software
my OS: http://67.11.191.209/software/view.php? ... Synergy_OS
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Here is my new one, I want to add some colors to it, but I'm having some problems
Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
It's not a lot but I'm still proud of it after all the hard work and head scratching its taken!
Next step, getting input from the keyboard...
Next step, getting input from the keyboard...