Re: What does your OS look like? (Screen Shots..)
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:01 pm
octacone: EDP? You meant ESP?
The Place to Start for Operating System Developers
http://f.osdev.org/
No he meant EBPLukand wrote:octacone: EDP? You meant ESP?
Personnaly I prefer the good old Guru Meditation error message over the BSODoctacone wrote:This topic is loosing its sense because of these ongoing discussions.
Basic OS Small Update:
-Added Blue Screen of Death System
-Capable of: dumping registers, showing your the error code and other important things such as what has happened to your OS
LolAMenard wrote:Personnaly I prefer the good old Guru Meditation error message over the BSODoctacone wrote:This topic is loosing its sense because of these ongoing discussions.
Basic OS Small Update:
-Added Blue Screen of Death System
-Capable of: dumping registers, showing your the error code and other important things such as what has happened to your OS
It says EDP. I guess it is EBP.Ch4ozz wrote:No he meant EBPLukand wrote:octacone: EDP? You meant ESP?
Cool!octacone wrote:LolAMenard wrote:Personnaly I prefer the good old Guru Meditation error message over the BSODoctacone wrote:This topic is loosing its sense because of these ongoing discussions.
Basic OS Small Update:
-Added Blue Screen of Death System
-Capable of: dumping registers, showing your the error code and other important things such as what has happened to your OSIt says EDP. I guess it is EBP.Ch4ozz wrote:No he meant EBPLukand wrote:octacone: EDP? You meant ESP?
Update:
+Added Printf function, my first one actually (never had one before), based on libk's implementation
Well, you should have implemented it earlier, for debugging purposes.Added Printf function, my first one actually (never had one before), based on libk's implementation
Thanks!catnikita255 wrote: Cool!
Yes, I know really awkward. Thanks!Lukand wrote: Well, you should have implemented it earlier, for debugging purposes.
Through, basing simple functions on other implementations is really... awkward.
But anyways, keep going further!
Why doesn't the text line up? Are you not using a monospaced font?octacone wrote:Thanks!catnikita255 wrote: Cool!
Yes, I know really awkward. Thanks!Lukand wrote: Well, you should have implemented it earlier, for debugging purposes.
Through, basing simple functions on other implementations is really... awkward.
But anyways, keep going further!
I feel like I am the only one posting in here:
Update:
+PCI improvements:
*added device id field
*fixed wrong vendor id values, used to be represented as integers now they are represented as hexadecimal numbers
Oh Bublin. Amazing OS!pcmattman wrote:i did a thing
Think you need to provide some details on this one, pcmattman.pcmattman wrote:i did a thing
Doesn't it copy a little bit of Classic Macintosh, huh? Anyways, great.trolly wrote:this is how my os looks now
it's written almost entirely in freebasic (and a little bit assembly for the init, and the interrupts bootstrap)