Are the only states in the markov chain "MS-DOS", "16 bit" and "real mode"?onlyonemac wrote:I'm afraid I don't think it's a joke. I think it's the output of a very sophisticated Markov chain.Walt wrote:Hi,
This is a joke right? I don't have any idea what is going on here.
Cheers
Walt
Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DOS)
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
com.sun.java.swing.plaf.nimbus.InternalFrameInternalFrameTitlePaneInternalFrameTitlePaneMaximizeButtonWindowNotFocusedState
Compiler Development Forum
Compiler Development Forum
-
- Member
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
No, I think the problem is that the Markov chain runs in 16-bit real mode under MS-DOS. There's also a "portable" version that can run under Windows 9x.zenzizenzicube wrote:Are the only states in the markov chain "MS-DOS", "16 bit" and "real mode"?onlyonemac wrote:I'm afraid I don't think it's a joke. I think it's the output of a very sophisticated Markov chain.Walt wrote:Hi,
This is a joke right? I don't have any idea what is going on here.
Cheers
Walt
When you start writing an OS you do the minimum possible to get the x86 processor in a usable state, then you try to get as far away from it as possible.
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
-
- Member
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2015 9:40 am
- Libera.chat IRC: glauxosdever
- Location: Athens, Greece
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
Hi,
Seriously now, it would be nice if this topic and its sister topic were moved to Auto-Delete to avoid even bigger droppings in ~'s reputation.
Regards,
glauxosdever
Nothing to debate over, it's just a disorganised home directory.onlyonemac wrote:No, I think the problem is that the Markov chain runs in 16-bit real mode under MS-DOS. There's also a "portable" version that can run under Windows 9x.zenzizenzicube wrote:Are the only states in the markov chain "MS-DOS", "16 bit" and "real mode"?onlyonemac wrote:I'm afraid I don't think it's a joke. I think it's the output of a very sophisticated Markov chain.
Seriously now, it would be nice if this topic and its sister topic were moved to Auto-Delete to avoid even bigger droppings in ~'s reputation.
Regards,
glauxosdever
-
- Member
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
Let's just say it's a home directory organised by a markov chain running in 16-bit real mode under MS-DOS - patched with support for long filenames (which may pseudorandomly be rendered in all-caps and/or surrounded by underscores).glauxosdever wrote:Nothing to debate over, it's just a disorganised home directory.onlyonemac wrote:No, I think the problem is that the Markov chain runs in 16-bit real mode under MS-DOS. There's also a "portable" version that can run under Windows 9x.zenzizenzicube wrote:Are the only states in the markov chain "MS-DOS", "16 bit" and "real mode"?
When you start writing an OS you do the minimum possible to get the x86 processor in a usable state, then you try to get as far away from it as possible.
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
-
- Member
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2015 9:40 am
- Libera.chat IRC: glauxosdever
- Location: Athens, Greece
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
Hi,
However, it was also intended to combine "home directory" with his server, which you got right.
Regards,
glauxosdever
I'm not sure you got the "home directory" joke.onlyonemac wrote:Let's just say it's a home directory organised by a markov chain running in 16-bit real mode under MS-DOS - patched with support for long filenames (which may pseudorandomly be rendered in all-caps and/or surrounded by underscores).glauxosdever wrote:Nothing to debate over, it's just a disorganised home directory.onlyonemac wrote:No, I think the problem is that the Markov chain runs in 16-bit real mode under MS-DOS. There's also a "portable" version that can run under Windows 9x.
However, it was also intended to combine "home directory" with his server, which you got right.
Regards,
glauxosdever
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
I was searching for some memory related topics and found this awesome quote. (no offense)
On-topic: no offense but DOS is dead. I think that you should keep the history where it belongs. Nobody needs to use DOS in 2016. I bet that 80% of these homemade operating system are more sophisticated than DOS. That is like trying to install Windows 10 on the Apple II. If you can't stop your DOS obsession, I would suggest you doing a modern DOS clone capable of lets say protected mode and graphics user interface. Please make your posts easy to read so you don't piss people off. Also no matter how much times I try to load your website I always fail.
kzinti wrote: I don't know what you are smoking, but I wouldn't mind having some of it.
On-topic: no offense but DOS is dead. I think that you should keep the history where it belongs. Nobody needs to use DOS in 2016. I bet that 80% of these homemade operating system are more sophisticated than DOS. That is like trying to install Windows 10 on the Apple II. If you can't stop your DOS obsession, I would suggest you doing a modern DOS clone capable of lets say protected mode and graphics user interface. Please make your posts easy to read so you don't piss people off. Also no matter how much times I try to load your website I always fail.
OS: Basic OS
About: 32 Bit Monolithic Kernel Written in C++ and Assembly, Custom FAT 32 Bootloader
About: 32 Bit Monolithic Kernel Written in C++ and Assembly, Custom FAT 32 Bootloader
-
- Member
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
Oh I get it, a disorganised "~". Because "~" is very disorganised...glauxosdever wrote:I'm not sure you got the "home directory" joke.
Actually that was my suggestion on page 1, if I remember correctly. EDIT: No it wasn't, but I still wonder sometimes whether that server runs in ~ or ~/public_html. EDIT: It's *probably* not in ~. EDIT: It seems he might be running... Windows? (Look at the filenames.)glauxosdever wrote:However, it was also intended to combine "home directory" with his server, which you got right.
Last edited by onlyonemac on Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:57 am, edited 3 times in total.
When you start writing an OS you do the minimum possible to get the x86 processor in a usable state, then you try to get as far away from it as possible.
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
-
- Member
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
Just sit with your finger on the F5 key until it starts loading. It never works the first time. (Also, I would advise against visiting the site for your own sanity.)octacone wrote:Also no matter how much times I try to load your website I always fail.
When you start writing an OS you do the minimum possible to get the x86 processor in a usable state, then you try to get as far away from it as possible.
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
-
- Member
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
I just realised that he actually has two "severs": the bad one and the really bad one.
When you start writing an OS you do the minimum possible to get the x86 processor in a usable state, then you try to get as far away from it as possible.
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
-
- Member
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2015 9:40 am
- Libera.chat IRC: glauxosdever
- Location: Athens, Greece
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
Hi,
Regards,
glauxosdever
I don't know what special do these filenames have.onlyonemac wrote:EDIT: It seems he might be running... Windows? (Look at the filenames.)
Regards,
glauxosdever
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
That site is slower than my memcopy function.
After 10 minutes of mashing F5 finally managed to load it.
After 10 minutes of mashing F5 finally managed to load it.
OS: Basic OS
About: 32 Bit Monolithic Kernel Written in C++ and Assembly, Custom FAT 32 Bootloader
About: 32 Bit Monolithic Kernel Written in C++ and Assembly, Custom FAT 32 Bootloader
-
- Member
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
"Copy of ...", "Copy (2) of ..." is how Windows names files that are copied. Also, he's definitely running Windows.glauxosdever wrote:Hi,
I don't know what special do these filenames have.onlyonemac wrote:EDIT: It seems he might be running... Windows? (Look at the filenames.)
Regards,
glauxosdever
When you start writing an OS you do the minimum possible to get the x86 processor in a usable state, then you try to get as far away from it as possible.
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
I don't understand how it's this slow. I have a web server running on an ancient MIPS processor with a few megs of RAM and it seems like a supercomputer compared to his server.onlyonemac wrote:Just sit with your finger on the F5 key until it starts loading. It never works the first time. (Also, I would advise against visiting the site for your own sanity.)octacone wrote:Also no matter how much times I try to load your website I always fail.
com.sun.java.swing.plaf.nimbus.InternalFrameInternalFrameTitlePaneInternalFrameTitlePaneMaximizeButtonWindowNotFocusedState
Compiler Development Forum
Compiler Development Forum
-
- Member
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
He's using his old Windows XP machine as a server. We had a Windows XP machine which, by the time we retired it as our main desktop, took about five minutes to log in and about thirty seconds and loads of disk thrashing to open anything. If that's the kind of machine he's using as a server, that's probably why it's so slow.zenzizenzicube wrote:I don't understand how it's this slow. I have a web server running on an ancient MIPS processor with a few megs of RAM and it seems like a supercomputer compared to his server.
When you start writing an OS you do the minimum possible to get the x86 processor in a usable state, then you try to get as far away from it as possible.
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
- Schol-R-LEA
- Member
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:42 am
- Location: Athens, GA, USA
Re: Skeleton for embedding test snippets (16-bit bootable/DO
Very likely. I suspect he's the second iteration of the design beta'd as 'Trident'.zenzizenzicube wrote:Are the only states in the markov chain "MS-DOS", "16 bit" and "real mode"?onlyonemac wrote:I'm afraid I don't think it's a joke. I think it's the output of a very sophisticated Markov chain.Walt wrote:Hi,
This is a joke right? I don't have any idea what is going on here.
Cheers
Walt
Rev. First Speaker Schol-R-LEA;2 LCF ELF JAM POEE KoR KCO PPWMTF
Ordo OS Project
Lisp programmers tend to seem very odd to outsiders, just like anyone else who has had a religious experience they can't quite explain to others.
Ordo OS Project
Lisp programmers tend to seem very odd to outsiders, just like anyone else who has had a religious experience they can't quite explain to others.