Page 2 of 2
Re: Files written to FAT12 not visible in real OS.
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 8:07 am
by zhiayang
Combuster wrote:Ignorance is not an excuse. It does support all FAT sizes,
Code: Select all
$ dito-format test.img:1 fat
Warning: Partition size requires fat 16 or 32, which are not implemented!
$
Re: Files written to FAT12 not visible in real OS.
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 8:22 am
by Combuster
mtools, thank you
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
Re: Files written to FAT12 not visible in real OS.
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:19 pm
by zhiayang
Well, I think it's fairly obvious that a tool written by GNU would support all FAT sizes. The only doubt of that would be DITO, which is user created and might not support all FAT sizes (it doesn't).
I just misinterpreted your reply i guess, but I'm still not going to use mtools' convoluted interface.