Page 2 of 2

Re: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32...

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:03 pm
by Albert
I use -fPIC myself, as putting the kernel in the upper 2GB messes up the nice property of recursively mapping the last PML4E entry. It still works if you put it in another entry, but you have to deal with the split

Re: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32...

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 11:48 pm
by gerryg400
It still works if you put it in another entry, but you have to deal with the split
What's "the split" ? I use entry 510. Seems to work fine