documentation for graphics drivers?

Question about which tools to use, bugs, the best way to implement a function, etc should go here. Don't forget to see if your question is answered in the wiki first! When in doubt post here.
jal
Member
Member
Posts: 1385
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:09 am

Re: documentation for graphics drivers?

Post by jal »

Combuster wrote:Which gets us to the conclusion - those older intel cards are programmed the same way as the latest of the series. I.e. the 945 behaves the same as the 965 wrt to mode setting.
I assumed as much, but didn't feel like setting up GIT to get the the source and check.


JAL
User avatar
Combuster
Member
Member
Posts: 9301
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Libera.chat IRC: [com]buster
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
Contact:

Re: documentation for graphics drivers?

Post by Combuster »

git is overrated. A browser will get you the latest tarball just fine :wink:
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]
OrOS
Member
Member
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:26 pm
Location: Canada

Re: documentation for graphics drivers?

Post by OrOS »

Combuster--; ;-(

Git > SVN > HG > CVS > Patches
User avatar
Combuster
Member
Member
Posts: 9301
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Libera.chat IRC: [com]buster
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
Contact:

Re: documentation for graphics drivers?

Post by Combuster »

more like, why use a vcs when you are not going to edit it?
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]
octavio
Member
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 5:12 am
Location: Barcelona España
Contact:

Re: documentation for graphics drivers?

Post by octavio »

Combuster wrote:Because consecutive chipsets are like supersets of one another.

Look at the driver's source, the majority is i830_xxxxx files, except for a few i915_xxxxx and i965_xxxxx files (which have i830 predecessors) These do not include mode setting, only video and hardware acceleration.

Which gets us to the conclusion - those older intel cards are programmed the same way as the latest of the series. I.e. the 945 behaves the same as the 965 wrt to mode setting.
Yes,after some testing with the 950 chip using 965 documentation,it seems they are very similar.I already can change resolution to 800*470 .
Post Reply