Page 2 of 2
Re: OSkit ?
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:24 am
by JamesM
quanganht wrote:My faults.
Somehow, when I extract the zipped file, some files are missed. But ".s" ?
Relying on Asm is not good. Pure C code will be much easier to understand and maintain, without platform dependent. And OSkit provide much more modules and libs.
You can't have platform independent paging code. It's CPU specific!
Re: OSkit ?
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:47 pm
by Craze Frog
JamesM wrote:quanganht wrote:My faults.
Somehow, when I extract the zipped file, some files are missed. But ".s" ?
Relying on Asm is not good. Pure C code will be much easier to understand and maintain, without platform dependent. And OSkit provide much more modules and libs.
You can't have platform independent paging code. It's CPU specific!
Your tutorial has paging code in a c file, and I agree, it's stupid.
Re: OSkit ?
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:24 pm
by quanganht
Craze Frog wrote:Your tutorial has paging code in a c file, and I agree, it's stupid.
How do you mean "stupid" ?
Re: OSkit ?
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 1:35 pm
by AJ
I get the impression he was trying to be funny. Although JamesM's paging code is in C, that doesn't mean its trying to be architecture independent.
Cheers,
Adam