Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 5:28 pm
The concept of "user friendlyness" is ill-defined as such. The problem is that it's a combination of easy-of-learning and effortlessness-of-using. Usually when you give the user more power, you also make it harder to learn. Windows is designed for ease-of-learning, while Unix is designed for effortlessness-of-using. It takes longer to learn how to use Unix well, but once you do, you can easily do stuff that it Windows is relatively painful.Tyler wrote:The Windows philosophy might suck, but there is definetly not one better, the UNIX-likes are just not user friendly, however many Windows look alike desktops you throw over them.
I don't think there's much point trying to argue for one or the other.
That said, having seen people learn both Unix and Windows at the same time, with little or no previous experience with either (and the Unix in question was indeed traditional shell environment on a remote server), I've heard many comments about how Unix is more logical: you usually have to lookup the manual, but at least there's one and when you tell it to do something, that's what you get. YMMV.