What's wrong with osdever? It has a lot of good tutorials, documents, and downloads that this site is almost completely lacking.~ wrote:Wow!
Is the OSDever.net site dead? So fast??? I can't believe it!
If it never gets up again, it will be a truly painful loss!!!
Starting with Linux, is it ok?
C8H10N4O2 | #446691 | Trust the nodes.
It's currently down, and that was noticed thanks to somebody who tried to download Bran' Development Kernel(s) tutorial and logically that could not be possible, but either browsing the site at all.
And I said it's rare because I have like more than 2 years and it could have had some minor problems but I NEVER saw it down not even once in all that time.
Well, at least I *think* I made a good back up of that site offline.
And I said it's rare because I have like more than 2 years and it could have had some minor problems but I NEVER saw it down not even once in all that time.
Well, at least I *think* I made a good back up of that site offline.
ZIP it up for me? I always assumed the site would be there for ever and didnt downlaod a single tutorial.... i already miss tim's good explanations of all things memory management. Just in case...~ wrote:It's currently down, and that was noticed thanks to somebody who tried to download Bran' Development Kernel(s) tutorial and logically that could not be possible, but either browsing the site at all.
And I said it's rare because I have like more than 2 years and it could have had some minor problems but I NEVER saw it down not even once in all that time.
Well, at least I *think* I made a good back up of that site offline.
It must help by now, for those who want the Bran' Kernel tutorial (if the site doesn't go up again then definitely the rest of the content will have to be organized):
http://didactos.blogsyte.com/bkerndev.zip
http://didactos.blogsyte.com/bkerndev.zip
It's been pretty well up as long as I've been osdeving which is around 4 years at least (based on my own code's copyright notices dating 2003 onwards). Let's hope it's temporary and the site'll come back. It was up a few days ago anyway.
The real problem with goto is not with the control transfer, but with environments. Properly tail-recursive closures get both right.