Infinate loop in gcc 3.4.5 make-gcc

Question about which tools to use, bugs, the best way to implement a function, etc should go here. Don't forget to see if your question is answered in the wiki first! When in doubt post here.
User avatar
Solar
Member
Member
Posts: 7615
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:01 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re:Infinate loop in gcc 3.4.5 make-gcc

Post by Solar »

Glad to hear it wasn't my stuff that borked. But I agree with Candy - you should bring this up with the maintainers of autoconf.
Every good solution is obvious once you've found it.
srg

Re:Infinate loop in gcc 3.4.5 make-gcc

Post by srg »

Solar wrote: Glad to hear it wasn't my stuff that borked. But I agree with Candy - you should bring this up with the maintainers of autoconf.
I see, it happends when I go make all, or make all-gcc, rather than ./configure, would this make a difference?
User avatar
Solar
Member
Member
Posts: 7615
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:01 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re:Infinate loop in gcc 3.4.5 make-gcc

Post by Solar »

No idea, really. You could try to find out (surgeon approach), or complain with the autoconf, make and gcc team (shotgun approach)... 8)
Every good solution is obvious once you've found it.
srg

Re:Infinate loop in gcc 3.4.5 make-gcc

Post by srg »

Solar wrote: No idea, really. You could try to find out (surgeon approach), or complain with the autoconf, make and gcc team (shotgun approach)... 8)
The "Here, shoot me down on flames" approach LOL :P
User avatar
Candy
Member
Member
Posts: 3882
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Eindhoven

Re:Infinate loop in gcc 3.4.5 make-gcc

Post by Candy »

Seeing the output and the fact that both make and gcc already report and complain about files-from-the-future correctly, I guess it's autoconf. Complain to them and tell them to complain to the gcc/make team if it isn't their problem.

Guess this would be the Oliver-Twist approach (please sir, I'd like a bugfix more).
srg

Re:Infinate loop in gcc 3.4.5 make-gcc

Post by srg »

I've also fixed the m68k-elf problem by using binutils 2.15 rather than 2.16/.1. The rest use 2.16.1.
Post Reply