OT or not OT - who cares? Me not. ::) shall Shakespeare deal with that kinda stuff.
@wacco: and still, the thing you plan to have in ring0 will be your kernel, so the plan to have something "kernel-less" is a bit high fetched, to speak honestly. You need it, at least for dealing with interrupts and for the task switching as you already state.
By the way, you've issued a true word, pretty well applicable to most other situations too: let's make something functional ere we talk about it. I like this credo. Reminds me of my own philosophy.
stay safe.
Linking C & Asm not working, references not found.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:59 am
- Location: Vienna/Austria
- Contact:
Re:Linking C & Asm not working, references not found.
... the osdever formerly known as beyond infinity ...
BlueillusionOS iso image
BlueillusionOS iso image
Re:Linking C & Asm not working, references not found.
My last few OT words about this...
Hmm. If you say so. Afaik (know/knew? ) an exokernel still forces an interprocess communication protocol, where mine doesn't even care about that anymore. But if you'd like to call it an exokernel, fine by me. The idea remains the same: there isn't much left to do for the kernel, userprocesses deal with practically everything.Solar wrote: Erm... wrong. Exokernels strive to do only the multiplexing of hardware ressources, while leaving abstraction to user-defined libraries (running in ring 0).
Thanks, I'll try, but they don't call me wacco for nothingbeyond infinity wrote: By the way, you've issued a true word, pretty well applicable to most other situations too: let's make something functional ere we talk about it. I like this credo. Reminds me of my own philosophy.
stay safe.