Question about which tools to use, bugs, the best way to implement a function, etc should go here. Don't forget to see if your question is answered in the wiki first! When in doubt post here.
Pete wrote:
Might want to back up the OSFaq just in case he starts adding comments
We can't really keep him from doing that (unless he's using a static IP we could ban), but we can always roll back whatever he adds, backup or no.
Because we - apparently opposed to him - have a rather clean Wiki and know how to use it. That page rather looks like a flame forum, not like a Wiki page.
Every good solution is obvious once you've found it.
My temper lowers a bit now. That nerd shall live in interesting times. Merde.
Nah. Not worth my time this is. Thats what the lad wants after all, isn't it. To draw attention upon himself so that he can feel good. "Look, how beautyful I am. Look how intelligent I am" might be what he thinks.
And btw, I am not hung up with *vfs crap* just started this weekend to actually implement my design. So shall he keep his trap tight ere he issues filthy and snide comments. *grmpf*
Ich bin ein G?nsebl?mchen /
im Sonnenschein /
und durch meine Bl?te /
scheint die Sonne in mich rein /
ich bin ein G?nsebl?mchen /
und mir wird ganz warm /
ich k?nnt' die ganze Welt /
und dann mich selbst umarm' /
ich bin ein G?nsebl?mchen /
und ich wei? genau /
irgendwann da kriege ich /
die dumme Sau... genau.
(Others: A German song of someone trying desperately - and not very successfully - to stay calm facing adverse conditions... )
Every good solution is obvious once you've found it.
"I am also brilliant, extremely insightful, and a natural philosopher" / "99% of my ideas are crap; I just have a factor of a million times more of them, at far deeper levels of abstraction, than the average man on the street"
Pretty much sums it up for me.
If you have to tell someone you're brilliant/insightful then you aren't, end of story.
The guy has basically told us that he's following the plot of Conspiracy Theory. If he produces enough crap theories then one of them is going to be correct.
Well here's a revelation dumbass. It doesn't take a genius to churn out bullshit theories. It doesn't even require knowledge of the subject you're theorising on. All it takes is a half-decent imagination.
Ignore him, strip any comments he makes from the Wiki, and leave to his mental masturbation.
This is the same reason I stopped looking at Tunes when researching problems. The attitude there is sometimes one of "This, and only this, is the right way. Otherwise you're dumb." However if I was referring to this guy it looks like I could remove the "sometimes" in that previous statement.
And YES, some of us think the exokernel scheme is irrelevant for what we're doing, and some of us are militantly OPPOSED to using the OO paradigm.
Fun game of the day:
See how many times you can find the word abstraction in a page with comments by this guy. Kinda like the fun "cool" game in Mac Keynote speeches.
That page rather looks like a flame forum, not like a Wiki page.